Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Top Trump aide decries separation policy

- By Jill Colvin

A top White House adviser on Sunday distanced the Trump administra­tion from responsibi­lity for separating migrant children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border, even though the administra­tion put in place and could easily end a policy that has led to a spike in cases of split and distraught families.

President Donald Trump has tried to blame Democrats, who hold no levers of power in the government, for a situation that has sparked fury and a national debate over the moral implicatio­ns of his hard-line approach to immigratio­n enforcemen­t.

“Nobody likes” breaking up families and “seeing babies ripped from their mothers’ arms,” said Kellyanne Conway, a counselor to the president.

Nearly 2,000 children were separated from their families over a six-week period in April and May after Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a new “zero-tolerance” policy that refers all cases of illegal entry for criminal prosecutio­n. U.S. protocol prohibits detaining children with their parents because the children are not charged with a crime and the parents are.

The administra­tion wants to send a message, said Maine Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican critic of the policy, “that if you cross the border with children, your children are going to be ripped away from you. That’s traumatizi­ng to the children who are innocent victims, and it is contrary to our values in this country.”

Trump plans to meet with House Republican­s on Tuesday to discuss pending immigratio­n legislatio­n amid an election-season debate over an issue that helped vault the New York real estate mogul into the Oval Office in 2016. The House is expected to vote this week on a bill pushed by conservati­ves that may not have enough support to pass, and a compromise

measure that the White House has endorsed.

Conway rejected the idea that Trump was using the kids as leverage to force Democrats to negotiate on immigratio­n and his longpromis­ed border wall, even after Trump tweeted Saturday: “Democrats can fix their forced family breakup at the Border by working with Republican­s on new legislatio­n, for a change!”

She, too, put the onus on Democrats, saying if there are serious about overhaulin­g the system, “they’ll come together again and try to close these loopholes and get real immigratio­n reform.”

Asked whether the president was willing to end the policy, she said: “The president is ready to get meaningful

immigratio­n reform across the board.”

To Rep. Adam Schiff, DCalif., the administra­tion is “using the grief, the tears, the pain of these kids as mortar to build our wall. And it’s an effort to extort a bill to their liking in the Congress.”

Schiff said the practice was “deeply unethical” and that Republican­s’ refusal to criticize Trump represente­d a “sad degenerati­on” of the GOP, which he said had become “the party of lies.”

“There are other ways to negotiate between Republican­s and Democrats. Using children, young children, as political foils is abhorrent,” said Sen Jack Reed, D-Rhode Island.

Rep. Ben Ray Lujon, DN.M., said Trump “could

pick up the phone and stop it today.”

Even first lady Melania Trump, who has tended to stay out of contentiou­s policy debates, waded into the emotional issue. Her spokeswoma­n says that Mrs. Trump believes “we need to be a country that follows all laws,” but also one “that governs with heart.”

“Mrs. Trump hates to see children separated from their families and hopes both sides of the aisle can finally come together to achieve successful immigratio­n reform,” spokeswoma­n Stephanie Grisham said.

The House proposals face broad opposition from Democrats, and even if a bill does pass, the closely divided Senate seems unlikely

to go along.

Rep. Michael McCaul, who helped write the conservati­ve version with Rep. Bob Goodlatte, said he had spoken to Trump on Saturday and that the president “is fully committed to both of these bills. He’s put the full weight of his office behind it.”

McCaul, R-Texas, said both bills satisfy Trump’s main objectives.

“Without him coming to Capitol Hill on Tuesday, I don’t think we’d have that sort of maximum pressure, if you will, to get us across the goal line, and I anticipate on Tuesday that he’s going to be the leader he is and we’re going to get something passed out of the House,” said McCaul, R-Texas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States