Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Democrats play the long game against Trump

- By Lisa Mascaro and Mary Clare Jalonick

First came the sternly worded letters. Then the subpoenas. Now the votes to hold Trump administra­tion officials in contempt of Congress.

As House Democrats plod ahead investigat­ing President Donald Trump, against unpreceden­ted stonewalli­ng by the White House, they are pursuing a long-game strategy that’s playing out in the committee rooms, the courthouse and in the court of public opinion. And it’s going to take time.

Some Democrats say the administra­tion’s blockade is leaving them almost no choice but to open an impeachmen­t inquiry — not necessaril­y to impeach Trump, but as part of a legal strategy to force the administra­tion to comply with their requests for documents and testimony.

“Things are coming to a tipping point,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the Judiciary Committee. “We’re running out of options,” said another on the panel, Rep. Val Demings, D-Fla. “I think we’re on the road,” said Rep. Jared Huffman, D-Calif.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi racheted up the pressure this week when, faced with a 12-page letter from the White House counsel saying Congress had no “legislativ­e purpose” in its investigat­ions, shot back that the purpose could, in fact, be for impeaching the president.

“We hope we don’t have to do that,” Pelosi said. “We want to see what we can get respectful­ly. First, we ask. Then we subpoena friendly. Then we subpoena otherwise. And then we see what we get.”

Democrats say they’re not ready to impeach the president. But opening an impeachmen­t inquiry would provide legal weight to their investigat­ions that would be tougher for the administra­tion to ignore. Already, a judge indicated last week Congress may have a right to review some of Trump’s financial documents. As Trump instructs his White House to reject the requests from Congress, more legal battles are coming.

Allan Lichtman, a professor at American University who wrote a book on impeachmen­t, said the administra­tion’s arguments for blocking Congress would likely go by the wayside in court if the House were in an impeachmen­t inquiry. The Constituti­on gives the House the sole power to impeach, which stretches even beyond its traditiona­l oversight role. It’s one thing for Trump to say the White House won’t respond to Congress. It’s another for the administra­tion to defy a court order to turn over documents.

“The courts have been very, very wary of interferin­g in the impeachmen­t power,” Lichtman said. “This is really a case where one branch of government rules.”

Pelosi, though, signaled she is in no rush to get there. Next week, there will be more steps in the process as Congress delves into Trump’s finances and possible obstructio­n of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the chairman of the Intelligen­ce Committee, said the panel will be taking an “enforcemen­t action” against Attorney General William Barr or the Justice Department after they refused to hand over an unredacted version of Mueller’s report and other documents.

Schiff wouldn’t say what that action would be. Options could include voting to recommend Barr be held in contempt of Congress, as the Judiciary Committee has done, among others. Schiff said he will be conferring with House lawyers on the strategy.

But as a federal court moved quickly in the case in which Trump is attempting to block Congress from his financial records, Schiff said, “what we have seen thus far has been very encouragin­g.”

The chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Richard Neal, DMass., said he was consulting with legal counsel after Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin failed to comply with the panel’s subpoena for Trump’s tax returns.

And the Judiciary Committee will weigh options if former White House counsel Don McGahn fails to comply with a subpoena to testify by Tuesday.

The step-by-step approach is part of a broader strategy by House Democrats to methodical­ly pursue their inquiries while giving the administra­tion multiple opportunit­ies to

comply.

For some, it can’t come fast enough as they consider the option of opening impeachmen­t proceeding­s.

“Everybody says ‘impeachmen­t’ and they’re like, ‘Oh, you’re going to impeach the president.’ That’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about an inquiry, and impeachmen­t inquiry, that might give us more tools to get the informatio­n that the administra­tion is refusing to provide to a coequal branch of government,” said Rep. Pramila

Jayapal, D-Wash.

“So as the administra­tion continues to do what they’re doing, I think there are more and more people, and it isn’t just progressiv­es, who feel like this is untenable,” she said.

“Members of Congress — like the American people — are exhausted by all this drama,” said Huffman. They wish it would all go away, he said. “I don’t think we have the luxury of that option. Not with this administra­tion, not with the offenses we’ve seen, not

with the daily and weekly institutio­nal challenges that are coming our way.”

 ??  ?? Pelosi
Pelosi
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States