Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Lawyers wrap; acquittal seems certain

Democratic prosecutor­s cite Founding Fathers; Trump team says voters should decide his fate

-

Closing arguments Monday in President Donald Trump’s impeachmen­t trial were directed more toward history than to sway the outcome, one final chance to influence public opinion and set the record ahead of his expected acquittal in the Republican-led Senate.

The House Democratic prosecutor­s drew on the Founding Fathers and common sense to urge senators — and Americans — to see that Trump’s actions are not isolated but a pattern of behavior that, left unchecked, will allow him to “cheat”’ in the 2020 election.

Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff implored those few Republican senators who have acknowledg­ed Trump’s wrongdoing in the Ukraine matter to prevent a “runaway presidency” and stand up to say “enough.”

“For a man like Donald J. Trump, they gave you a remedy and meant for you to use it. They gave you an oath, and they meant

for you to observe it,” Schiff said. “We have proven Donald Trump guilty. Now do impartial justice and convict him.”

The president’s defense countered the Democrats have been out to impeach Trump since the start of his presidency, nothing short of an effort to undo the 2016 election and try to shape the next one.

“Leave it to the voters to choose,” said White House counsel Pat Cipollone.

He called for an end to the partisan “era of impeachmen­t.”

All that’s left, as the Senate prepares to acquit Trump on Wednesday on charges that he abused power and obstructed Congress, is for Americans to decide the president’s fate

in November.

Most senators acknowledg­e the House Democratic managers proved their case. Trump was impeached in December on two charges: that he abused his power when he pushed Ukraine to investigat­e rival Democrats in exchange for military aid, then obstructed Congress by instructin­g aides to defy House subpoenas.

But key Republican­s have decided the president’s actions toward Ukraine do not rise to the level of impeachabl­e offense that warrants the dramatic political upheaval of conviction and removal from office. His acquittal in Wednesday’s vote is all but assured.

GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska called the president’s actions “shameful and wrong,” but in a powerful speech late Monday, she also derided the highly partisan

process. “I cannot vote to convict,” she said.

Republican Sens. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Marco Rubio of Florida and Rob Portman of Ohio also are among those who acknowledg­e the inappropri­ateness of Trump’s actions but say they won’t vote to convict.

“What message does that send?” asked Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., a House prosecutor. He warned senators that for Trump, the “past is prologue.” He urged the Senate to realize its failure to convict will “allow the president’s misconduct to stand.”

The Senate proceeding­s are set against a sweeping political backstop, as voters in Iowa on Monday are choosing from among Democratic presidenti­al candidates and Trump is poised to deliver his State of the Union address Tuesday.

It is unclear if any Republican

or Democratic senators sworn to do “impartial justice’’ will break from party lines. One centrist Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin, W-Va., said he was heavily weighing the vote ahead. He suggested censure could be a bipartisan alternativ­e.

The House Democrats unveiled a striking case centered on Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, running an alternativ­e foreign policy that drew alarm at the highest levels. As part of the “scheme,” Trump held up $391 million in U.S. aid from Ukraine, a fragile ally battling Russia, for his personal political gain, they argued. The money was released after Congress intervened.

As Chief Justice John Roberts presided, the House managers opened their Monday arguments with a plea from Rep. Jason

Crow, D-Colo., a freshman and former Army Ranger: “We cannot and should not leave our common sense at the door.”

One by one, the Democrats drew on their life experience­s to remind senators, and Americans, of the simple difference between right and wrong in the case against Trump.

Rep. Val Demings, a former police chief, argued the president is not behaving like someone who is innocent. She warned that if senators do not convict, they will “send a terrible message to the nation that one can get away with abuse of power, cheating and spreading of false narratives.”

Trump defender Kenneth Starr, the former prosecutor whose investigat­ion led to President Bill Clinton’s impeachmen­t in 1998, complained about the inadequacy of the House prosecutor­s’

“fast track” case.

Trump attorney Jay Sekulow showed political clips of Democrats calling for impeachmen­t to argue this was the “first totally partisan presidenti­al impeachmen­t in our nation’s history, and it should be our last.”

One key Trump lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, who was forced to walk back a sweeping defense of presidenti­al power in last week’s arguments, did not appear.

Trump wanted acquittal secured before he arrives at the Capitol for the State of the Union address Tuesday, but that will not happen.

Senators carrying the power of their votes to the history books wanted additional time to make their own arguments, in public speeches from the floor of the Senate. Those began Monday afternoon and were expected to continue until Wednesday’s vote.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? In this image from video, House impeachmen­t manager Rep. Val Demings, D-Fla., speaks Monday in the Senate chamber during closing arguments in the impeachmen­t trial of President Donald Trump.
ASSOCIATED PRESS In this image from video, House impeachmen­t manager Rep. Val Demings, D-Fla., speaks Monday in the Senate chamber during closing arguments in the impeachmen­t trial of President Donald Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States