Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Police to adopt guidelines for misconduct by officers

- By Michael R. Sisak

When the New York Police Department fired an officer last year for putting Eric Garner in a deadly chokehold, the officer’s union argued that there was little, if any, precedent within the department’s internal disciplina­ry system for such a penalty.

Now, the nation’s largest police department is spelling out potential ramificati­ons for officer misconduct, unveiling on Monday a draft of a discipline matrix that will guide punishment decisions similarly to how sentencing guidelines are used in criminal cases. It will be adopted after a 30day public comment period.

“We wanted to make it very, very clear that if you do certain things there are certain consequenc­es,” said Assistant Chief Matthew Pontillo, who helped develop the disciplina­ry policies with the help from department officials and outside agencies.

Mayor Bill de Blasio called it a “big step forward for transparen­cy and accountabi­lity.” Fred Davie, chair of the city’s police watchdog agency, said he was “encouraged by some of the clear standards laid out in this new set of rules.”

Police reform advocates weren’t as enthused, arguing the NYPD still has too much power policing its own and that it rarely enforces top penalties. The New York Civil Liberties Union cited data showing that just 12 officers have been fired for misconduct since the mid1980s. The NYPD, however, said many more officers have been dismissed or forced to separate from the department, including 27 in 2018 and 31 in 2017.

The head of the city’s largest police union blasted the guidelines for different reasons, painting them as a way for elected officials “to manipulate NYPD discipline to further their radical political goals.”

“Apparently mandatory minimums and sentencing guidelines are unfair to criminals but perfectly fine for cops,” said Pat Lynch, president of the Police Benevolent Associatio­n, suggesting the guidelines would be subject to change “based on headlines and poll numbers, rather than any objective sense of justice or fairness.”

The NYPD is shifting to formal disciplina­ry guidelines at a time when law enforcemen­t agencies around the world are being pressed to be more transparen­t about discipline in the wake of protests over the Minneapoli­s police killing of George Floyd in May.

Police Commission­er Dermot Shea, who will still have the final say on discipline, said it was important to have a “road map” so the public and officers know what to expect. Developmen­t of the matrix was well underway when city council passed a law in June mandating its use. The law also requires that the public be informed how often Shea deviates from it.

Around the same time, state lawmakers sought to shed more light by repealing a decades-old law that had kept police disciplina­ry files secret. Police unions suing to block their release are appealing after a judge ruled last week that they should be made public.

A 48-page draft report lists presumptiv­e penalties for dozens of forms of misconduct, including terminatio­n for using deadly physical force without justificat­ion, engaging in hate speech and making a false statement.

Among the other items covered in the matrix: If an officer forgets to turn on his or her body camera while responding to an incident, he or she can be suspended or docked three days, but if it’s done intentiona­lly, it’s a 20-day punishment.

Accessing confidenti­al informatio­n can be punished with a 10-day suspension or loss of vacation days, while leaking confidenti­al informatio­n to the news media can be punished with a 20day suspension or loss of vacation days.

Chokeholds resulting in death and the intentiona­l use of a chokehold are also grounds for firing. The NYPD has long banned chokeholds and lawmakers recently passed laws explicitly outlawing the tactic. One was named for Garner, who died in 2014 after then-Officer Daniel Pantaleo put him in a chokehold.

In developing a discipline matrix, the NYPD is fulfilling one of the last remaining recommenda­tions from a panel of criminal justice experts that examined the disciplina­ry process on its behalf two years ago.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States