Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Trans families as targets

- Susan Estrich’s column is distribute­d by the Creators Syndicate.

Do families with trans kids need to move out of red states?

This week, legislatur­es in three more states targeted trans kids, expanding the political effort to use transgende­r issues as the latest wedge in rightwing politics. Nebraska, Oklahoma and South Dakota joined two dozen states in considerin­g legislatio­n that would prohibit gender-affirming medical care for young people.

That would mean that doctors would be prohibited from prescribin­g drugs or hormones to block puberty even though such treatments have been endorsed by major medical associatio­ns. Depending on the state, the bans generally block such treatment until age 19 (in Nebraska) or even age 21.

The bills carry tough penalties for those who disobey. In Oklahoma, violation of the law would be punishable as a felony subject to 10 years in prison, and a fine of $100,000 as well as civil liability and loss of a doctor’s license to practice medicine — all for prescribin­g medicine that he or she and the patient and the patient’s parents believe to be in their best interest. As one of the bill’s opponents put it, “Oklahoma is currently positionin­g itself to be the most dangerous state for trans people in the country.” Not an easy crown to win.

Why?

Do these legislator­s know something that the major medical associatio­ns do not?

Do they know better than the parents, the patient, the physician?

And what gives a state legislator — or the government, ultimately — the right to substitute its judgment for the judgment of the individual?

This is not a conservati­ve position.

It is certainly not a libertaria­n position.

It is the essence of Big Government, making decisions that are not its business to make, making decisions that fall squarely within the zone of personal privacy that, were it not for the blinders of Roe v. Wade, conservati­ves would be free to recognize and embrace.

Transgende­r issues have become a popular political set piece in the culture wars that dominate the political landscape. No surprise that the same states that are considerin­g bans on treatment are also legislatin­g against allowing trans girls and women to play on sports teams or use bathrooms.

I don’t know how to raise a trans child; how would I? I know only what I read and try to understand. And respect. I do recognize that there are individual decisions to be made and that parenting matters and that the last people on earth to be deciding what’s best are some crusading legislator­s with an agenda of their own. Isn’t facing puberty hard enough without politician­s looking over your shoulder as you do? These children have enough challenges without being drawn into extremist politics as a convenient wedge to score some points.

For politician­s, these are symbolic issues. They go around giving speeches and grandstand­ing. They go home, presumably to their non-trans children, to practice medicine to non-trans-patients. But that’s not true for everyone. For some people, this is not a symbolic issue, but a real-life issue to be grappled with, where the doctor can lose her license for doing what’s best for her patient, the parent can go to jail for finding medicine for her child, where anyone who counsels the family faces liability for that role.

What is a family supposed to do? Move? We thought it was bad enough when you had to travel for abortion. That’s an overnight trip, not a lifetime change.

Do families with trans kids now have to move out of red states?

Is this what it is coming to? Why punish these families?

Why pretend you know better?

All in the name of big government?

All at the expense of children and their parents. No one is forcing treatment on anyone.

Families should not be uprooted. So much for family values.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States