Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Tale of two governors: Wolf and DeSantis

-

With apologies to Charles Dickens: he was the best of governors, he was the worst of governors, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishnes­s. Such sums up the tale of two states — Florida and Pennsylvan­ia and their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The contrast was brought into full focus during Primary election week. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a rapidly rising star in the national Republican Party, was the featured speaker at the Republican Committee of Allegheny County’s annual spring dinner. DeSantis was celebrated for his deft handling of the pandemic and for the Sunshine state’s measured approach to the crisis.

DeSantis spurned the draconian shutdown measures enacted by blue state governors ending shutdowns and mask mandates early in the pandemic. Despite having the largest senior population in the country — the most vulnerable demographi­c to the disease — Florida’s numbers ranked among the lowest in the nation.

Florida’s economy has also rebounded quickly. Unemployme­nt, which spiked a year ago at the height of the pandemic, has returned to normal levels. Business closures were held to a minimum, bars and restaurant­s resumed normal operations. Mass distributi­on of the vaccine proceeded smoothly and in a timely manner.

While DeSantis basked in the glow of his fellow Republican­s in Pittsburgh voters statewide were handing Pennsylvan­ia Gov. Tom Wolf a historic comeuppanc­e. Following the lead of other bluestate governors including New York’s Andrew Cuomo and Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer, Wolf assumed dictatoria­l powers issuing unilateral decrees, imposing draconian shut-downs and tramping individual rights. All this without legislativ­e or stakeholde­r consultati­on, and done in abeyance of the state’s open records laws and generally accepted standards of transparen­cy.

The Republican-controlled legislatur­e tried mightily to counter Wolf’s excesses only to be blocked by repeated gubernator­ial vetoes. Having had enough, the legislatur­e took the rare step of voting to end the governor’s emergency powers. By law, that resolution required no signature by the governor. But, Pennsylvan­ia’s activist union-controlled state Supreme Court effectivel­y rewrote the law giving Wolf a temporary victory.

And then something amazing happened. It is important that we pause here for a moment to reflect on how truly unique and significan­t is this moment in our commonweal­th’s history.

Amending the state constituti­on is necessaril­y a difficult process. Since it was adopted in 1968 Pennsylvan­ia’s constituti­on has been amended 46 times. None of those amendments were passed to curb the power of the state’s chief executive during a still unfolding circumstan­ce.

For the state constituti­on to be amended it must pass two consecutiv­e sessions of the General Assembly in exactly the same form. Passing legislatio­n once is difficult; doing so twice without changing the bill is exceedingl­y rare. But lawmakers did just that setting up the final step in the process — a statewide voter referendum to approve amendments that would give the General Assembly the clear power to end a gubernator­ial declaratio­n of emergency.

Tom Wolf knew he was in trouble. Grassroots rebellion against his dictates had been strong since the beginning of the pandemic, now those he had subjugated would make the final decision. Using Orwellian doublespea­k the governor claimed the pending referendum was “anti-democratic.” He then unleashed a campaign of disinforma­tion about the amendments sending out an array of state officials to peddle gloom and doom prediction­s and having the ballot questions themselves written in a confusing and misleading manner.

It was all for naught. On Tuesday, May 18, the people of Pennsylvan­ia went to the polls and restored liberty. The amendments that would curb the power of Wolf — and future governors — were approved. When final election results are certified balance between the legislativ­e and executive branches of state government will be restored.

Passage of these amendments represents an unpreceden­ted rebuke of a sitting governor. Unlike California, we lack the ability to recall a rogue executive. This was essentiall­y a vote of no confidence in Tom Wolf and his administra­tion which has bungled virtually every aspect of the pandemic response.

Now, it is up to the General Assembly. While understand­ing that the pandemic is ongoing and a measured response is still necessary, the time has come to put an end to most of Tom Wolf’s egregious policies. And, if they want a roadmap on what to do next — lawmakers should look South. Ron DeSantis and Florida have shown us the way forward.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States