Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Government as a bad ‘SNL’ sketch

- Christine Flowers

I remember when they got rid of the Immigratio­n and Naturaliza­tion Service, otherwise known as INS. It happened in 2003 in the wake of 9/11. A new federal department was created, the Department of Homeland Security, and the office that used to process immigratio­n issues was folded into it. The Secretary became a cabinet position, with Pennsylvan­ia’s governor Tom Ridge tapped as the first person to fill the role.

I remember my first reaction to the name of the new department. “Homeland Security” conjured up images of old WWI posters with Uncle Sam pointing his finger directly at us in an intimidati­ng way.

“Homeland” also made me think of Nazi Germany or other totalitari­an states that made a cult out of devotion to what they also called the “Motherland.” It wasn’t a comfortabl­e feeling, particular­ly when you understand the context: The Department of Homeland Security was created to defend the “homeland” against terrorists, foreigners who had attacked the heart of the nation and assassinat­ed over 3,000 of our innocent fellow Americans.

“Homeland” felt like a call to arms, and having immigratio­n become a part of this department set an unfortunat­e tone that conflated immigrants with terrorists. I was fairly outspoken about it at the time, and still have a problem with anything that recalls authoritar­ianism, even rhetorical­ly.

That’s why I reacted with shock and horror at the news that Joe Biden had created a sub office at DHS with the name “Disinforma­tion Governance Board,” and had placed at its head a Bryn Mawr grad. Nina Jankowicz was the woman who infamously made fun of Hunter Biden’s laptop during the last presidenti­al debate between Hunter’s daddy and Donald Trump, tweeting out “Back on the ‘laptop from hell’ apparently.”

My first thought is that I sure hope Nina didn’t major in English at Bryn Mawr, because our professors would be hanging their heads in shame at her syntax.

But Nina isn’t even really the worst part of this whole affair, even though her dismissive comments about the “laptop from hell” may come back to haunt her. The worst part is that our government has just carved out a nice little agency to police speech, one that would have fit in quite well in Oceania, the “fictional” country imagined by Orwell in his book “1984.” The quotation marks around fictional are my feeble attempts at humor, to stave off the tears.

Let’s take a moment to examine why Joe Biden decided that he needed to create a federal office devoted to the “truth.” It is ostensibly designed to dissuade immigrants from falling prey to human trafficker­s who use lies and “disinforma­tion” to manipulate vulnerable population­s into paying them large sums of money, with promises that they can cross the border.

As someone who has firsthand experience with the victims of these trafficker­s, commonly known as “coyotes,” I actually find a great deal of value in the U.S. government putting out accurate informatio­n to prevent the exploitati­on of desperate people, usually women and children. I’ve been speaking out about the mixed messages that our government has been sending out since the Obama administra­tion, when Biden’s boss presided over the largest wave of human cargo in the modern history of the U.S. Only the most feeble attempts were made to communicat­e the message that it was dangerous to cross the border. In fact, I have to give credit to Vice President Kamala Harris, who was one of the few in this administra­tion to actually come out and say to Mexicans and Central Americans, “Stay home.” She wasn’t telling them not to seek asylum. She was, though, warning about the dangers of human traffickin­g. So from that perspectiv­e, this office has some legitimacy.

But Biden and his cronies went far beyond that limited purpose. They’ve said that the office is going to combat “Russian disinforma­tion” (he’s beginning to sound like CNN) and also the type of untruths that get bandied about on social media. They are doing this, in their own words, to make sure that the upcoming mid term elections and free and fair. And in order to guarantee that there won’t be any “disinforma­tion” or “bad speech” being put out there by the Russians, Elon Musk, the Babylon Bee and yours truly, the president has put a woman who has a problem with free speech at the head of the operation.

Anyone who is afraid of free speech deserves to be governed by the “Disinforma­tion Board of Governance.” Just leave the rest of us, who are fine with the Constituti­on, alone.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States