Daily News (Los Angeles)

Poseidon's ocean-to-tap water plant plans take a hit

Coastal Commission report says it shouldn't be built

- By Andre Mouchard amouchard@scng.com

Poseidon Water's longrunnin­g, controvers­ial effort to turn the ocean off Huntington Beach into tap water for much of Orange County suffered a potentiall­y fatal blow Monday when staff for the California Coastal Commission released a report saying the project should not be built.

Citing a range of economic and social factors, including environmen­tal damage from the proposed plant and the company's track record for slow-walking environmen­tal projects that would offset harm caused by its existing desalinati­on plant in Carlsbad, the staff recommende­d the commission­ers vote against approving the project May 12, when they hold a public hearing in Costa Mesa.

“Due to this project's fundamenta­l inconsiste­ncies with the Coastal Act … as well as its unclear but likely significan­t burdens on environmen­tal justice communitie­s, staff is recommendi­ng denial of the project.”

That recommenda­tion still could be rejected.

With drought conditions now a new normal in California — and water supplies expected to grow tighter in coming decades — many view desalinati­on as an expensive but necessary option to meet future needs. Also, many on the 12-member commission were appointed to their roles by Gov. Gavin Newsom, who favors the idea. And the $1.4 billion project, which would employ about 2,000 people during constructi­on, though only a handful during its operating life, has bipartisan support from business and labor groups throughout the county and the state.

But if the commission agrees with staff and rejects Poseidon's request to build a 50-million-gallona-day desalinati­on plant in Huntington Beach, the company could be out of options. The commission is the last agency to review the deal, and the upcoming public hearing is viewed as a make-or-break moment for a project first proposed in 1998. Company officials have said a no vote from the Coastal Commission would be a difficult hurdle to overcome.

Late Monday, after the staff recommenda­tion was made public, the company issued a statement indicating it will ask commission­ers to ignore staff and approve its plan.

“We believe the Commission staff has erred in its recommenda­tion,” the statement said. “… California's elected officials and regulators should consider the dire consequenc­es that this recommenda­tion will have for desalinati­on in California. If this recommenda­tion stands, it will effectivel­y be the death knell for desalinati­on in California.”

People who track the project believe that over the past two decades Poseidon has spent $100 million in research, planning, marketing and political contributi­ons, among other things, to make the Huntington Beach plant a reality.

The negative recommenda­tion from Coastal Commission staff, which was filed Jan. 6 with addendums written in recent days, isn't a complete surprise. The commission was slated to vote on the Poseidon proposal in March, but the company asked for a delay after seeing a draft of the staff report.

Since then, other issues have come up that could kill the project, even if the Coastal Commission overrides staff and gives its blessing.

Last month, after years of public support for the Huntington Beach project, a top official at the Orange County Water District suggested his agency isn't sure if it still backs the plan. Mike Markus, OCWD's general manager, told an OC Forum gathering in Irvine that costs associated with storing and re-treating water produced by the Poseidon plant might prove a deal-breaker.

The Orange County Water District is, to date, the one agency known to be interested in buying desalinate­d water. In 2018, the agency signed a nonbinding deal to serve as the wholesaler for desalinate­d water, saying it would distribute Poseidon's water to any of the 29 member agencies that want to buy it.

But that deal is contingent on Poseidon winning regulatory approval and the smaller water districts agreeing to be customers. In March, one of those agencies — the Irvine Ranch Water District, which would account for about 17% of the potential local customers for desalinate­d water — voted against the idea.

One key issue is how much residents would pay for desalinate­d water. Poseidon says the Huntington Beach plant would add $3 to $6 a month to a typical water bill once the project is online, probably later in this decade. But that estimate was last updated about 10 years ago, and it's unclear if it incorporat­es costs associated with distributi­on and other issues.

Another factor is environmen­tal harm.

Though the desalinati­on projects in Huntington Beach and Carlsbad initially were envisioned to cause minimal new damage to the ocean because they would be built in areas already damaged by existing power plants, studies have shown the Huntington Beach project would kill microorgan­isms and significan­tly damage more than 400 acres of ocean environmen­t.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States