Daily Press (Sunday)

GOP MUST CHEAT TO WIN

-

So Georgia voters decided against Stacey Abrams as their governor. Maybe.

With all the shenanigan­s perpetrate­d by Republican­s in that state, we’ll never know for sure. Had they not passed a restrictiv­e “exact match” law that put 53,000 voters (most of them reportedly African-American) in electoral limbo over misplaced commas and transposed letters in their names, had they not purged 107,000 infrequent voters from the rolls in 2017, would she have lost?

No one can say, though Abrams certainly made her opinion clear last week in the nonconcess­ion speech that ended her bid to become the first black woman to govern a U.S. state. “Democracy failed Georgia,” she said.

Truth be told, it is failing a lot of places. The nonpartisa­n Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law reports that 24 states have enacted laws since 2010 to make voting more difficult. These include Photo I.D. laws, laws cutting back on early voting, laws restrictin­g ex-felons from casting ballots, laws requiring street addresses from voters in places where there are no street addresses.

The Republican Party line is that this is needed to fight voting fraud. Which is a lie. Voting fraud exists primarily in the party’s imaginatio­n.

No, the truth is that, as this country becomes blacker, browner, gayer, younger, more Hispanic and more Muslim, it is increasing­ly the case that the GOP cannot win if all voters vote. It cannot win, in other words, without cheating.

Thus it passes laws to reduce voting among people disincline­d to vote Republican. Indeed, some party members have explicitly said as much. As in a recent video of Mississipp­i Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith “joking” — or so her campaign calls it — about what a “great idea” it is to enact laws that “make it just a little more difficult” for “liberal folks” to vote.

Mississipp­i, of course, is where Andrew Goodman, Medgar Evers, Michael Schwerner, George Lee, Vernon Dahmer, James Chaney and Herbert Lee were murdered because some people thought it “a great idea” to make it “just a little more difficult” for them to vote. Perhaps the senator will forgive those of us who remember that and thus, find it hard to appreciate her sparkling wit.

The Voting Rights Act once provided at least some protection against voter suppressio­n. But in 2013, the Supreme Court cut out its heart, a section that prevented places with a history of discrimina­tion from changing their voting laws without federal approval.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts justified the decision by noting how much progress has been made toward ensuring the right to vote since the Act was passed in 1965. In effect, he said that because the VRA worked, it was no longer needed. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted in her dissent, this was “like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”

In the absence of the Act, Republican­s are running riot over African-American and other people’s voting rights. This bacchanal of suppressio­n is terribly short-sighted, striking as it does at democracy’s vitals. Put simply: When the integrity and fairness of the vote can’t be trusted, neither can the legitimacy of any government that vote installs.

The GOP is playing with fire. The right to vote must be sacrosanct, the path to the ballot box free from artificial impediment­s designed to advantage one party over another. Congress must restore and strengthen the Voting Rights Act. Because Ginsburg was right about umbrellas.

And right now, we are getting soaked. Pitts is a columnist for The Miami Herald. Send email to lpitts@miamiheral­d.com.

Talk about race

The concept of talking about politics to move forward from the elections is something that interests me.

Inviting someone over for lunch with an opposing viewpoint is just what our society needs right now to help come together.

Most people who are divided politicall­y are also divided racially. The protests in Charlottes­ville were mainly political at first but race became a very important thing very quickly.

By talking about racial difference­s, I think we would also be able to move forward, expand our views, and possibly help to diminish the effect of race on everyday interactio­ns.

Everyone will be able to mature by talking about things instead of immediatel­y labeling someone as racist.

Our skin color should not relate the way we treat each other. Coming together on political and racial fronts is the only way to move forward to a better society. Eliana Specht Virginia Beach

 ??  ??
 ?? Leonard
Pitts ??
Leonard Pitts

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States