IN SYRIA, THE CHAOS IS COMING
After the communists under Mao Zedong won their revolution, Republicans in Washington raised the cry, “Who lost China?” Now, all these years later, Republicans are asking the same question about Syria. Their answer is Barack Obama. My answer is both Obama and President
Trump share the blame, with this difference: Before Trump had a chance to lose Syria, he lost his mind.
The president’s madness is given voice by the dizzyingly hapless
Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state until he’s either replaced or runs from the Foggy Bottom building screaming, “I can’t take it anymore!” In one of the more confusing foreign policy speeches of modern times, Pompeo bugled both charge and retreat in Cairo last week: “America will not retreat until the terror fight is over” and that “President Trump has made the decision to bring our troops home from Syria.” Not only did the contradiction give him no pause, but he compounded matters by declaring: “When America retreats, chaos often follows. When we neglect our friends, resentment builds.”
In this case, chaos both preceded and followed. Trump’s withdrawal decision, announced in a December tweet, caught allies by surprise. Israel was troubled. France and Britain were puzzled. The Kurds felt betrayed. James Mattis, the secretary of defense, resigned. So did Brett McGurk, the U.S. envoy to the international coalition fighting the Islamic state. Sen. Lindsey Graham hurried to the White House. He urged Trump to at least slow the withdrawal process. The president’s original “now,” may turn out to be months — or longer. The world awaits a tweet.
Both the president and Pompeo are right: Obama messed up in
Syria. He should have intervened when there really was a moderate opposition to Bashar Assad. And he should have redeemed his implied threat when he characterized Assad’s use of chemical weapons as a “red line.” Instead, after a deadly sarin attack, Obama did virtually nothing. Trump, in contrast, twice struck Syria for using chemical weapons.
Syria has become the modernday equivalent of the Balkans before World War I. It is a powder keg waiting for a match. It is where U.S., Russian, Iranian, Turkish, Kurdish, Saudi, Islamist and Israeli interests collide. Israel and Iran are already fighting a proxy war there — sortie after sortie of Israeli jets hitting Iranian installations in Syria. Iran has armed Hezbollah, and Russia has armed Syria.
Aside from George W. Bush’s attempt to rearrange the Middle East, the region has been lucky. But there are just too many players in Syria to rely on luck alone. The Turks are anxious to get at the Kurds. Iran in Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon want at Israel. Assad wants to settle too many scores to count and his ally is Russia, which just delivered a fresh supply of missiles. Trump ought to hearken to Pompeo’s wise words: “When America retreats, chaos often follows.” Yet, America is retreating.
To carry the Balkans analogy a bit further, someone ought to tell Trump about Kosovo. That tiny Balkan region, now an aspiring independent republic, was saved in 1999 from Serbian occupation and the customary bloodbath by a determined U.S.-led NATO intervention. Air power was used, no boots on the ground. Russia, a Serb ally, vetoed a United Nations authorization of intervention, so NATO acted on its own.
American air power can — and has — worked well in Syria. It has punished the Islamic State and, just as important, it has shown all the other players that the U.S. has an interest in the region. The greater interest, though, is to avoid a wider war.
Nations, like children, crave predictability. They need to know the rules. The U.S. is like a parent. Other countries look to it for guidance and to enforce the rules. Trump has utterly failed in that regard. The question now is not whether he will lose Syria, but whether he will lose the entire region. He’s well on his way.