Daily Press

Federal action on drug prices would offer broad benefit

- By Dr. Aubrey Mason Aubrey Mason, M.D., is a resident of Dumfries and a full-time student pursuing a master’s of public health degree (health policy/ epidemiolo­gy) at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

As the price of prescripti­on drugs increases, research shows that 1 in 4 Virginians struggle to afford prescripti­on drugs, with 27% not filling a prescripti­on and cutting pills in half due to concerns about the cost.

About 1.6 million Virginia residents are enrolled in Medicare, and most of them are unaware Medicare is currently prohibited from negotiatin­g prescripti­on drug prices due to a Medicare Part D non-interferen­ce clause. Several studies indicate that allowing Medicare to negotiate directly with drug manufactur­ers would lower prescripti­on drug costs while rewarding innovation and breakthrou­gh of new treatment options. This proposal has strong bipartisan public support.

On Nov. 2, House and Senate Democrats reached a breakthrou­gh agreement on lowering prescripti­on drug prices for seniors and families in the Build Back Better legislatio­n as part of the $1.75 trillion reconcilia­tion bill. This legislatio­n includes the provision for Medicare to negotiate prices for high-cost prescripti­on drugs, such as drugs seniors get at the pharmacy counter through Medicare Part D and drugs administer­ed in a doctor’s office through Medicare Part B. This legislatio­n needs to be passed in Congress for it to become law.

In its implementa­tion, negotiatio­ns will be held annually for 250 prescripti­on drugs, including the 125 most costly drugs offered by Medicare Part D plans or sold anywhere in the commercial market. This authority would apply to brand-name drugs with little or no competitio­n from generic or biosimilar medicines and all insulin products. Drugs that are new to the market may be eligible for negotiatio­n if the wholesale acquisitio­n cost, also called the list price, is equal to or greater than the U.S. median household income ($78,500 in 2020).

Medicare drug negotiatio­ns will directly lower out-of-pocket costs for its beneficiar­ies in Virginia by lowering beneficiar­y premiums and cost-sharing.

Currently, there is a cap of more than $6,000 a year in cost-sharing. Negotiatio­ns and current proposals ensure that seniors and people with disabiliti­es never pay more than $2,000 a year for their drugs under Medicare Part D. The Congressio­nal Budget Office estimates that drug prices would reduce by 57-75%.

The benefits for the federal government cannot be overemphas­ized.

According to the Congressio­nal Budget Office, negotiatio­ns are estimated to save the federal government more than $500 billion over 10 years. This includes direct savings to the Medicare Part D program,

a reduction in spending for the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and increased government revenue from employers using savings from reduced premiums to fund taxable wage increases for their workers.

Experts who oppose allowing Medicare prescripti­on drug price negotiatio­ns have often argued that it would lead to limited drug options for Medicare beneficiar­ies, increased drug prices and result in a lack of innovation.

A recent Kaiser Family Foundation poll disagrees and indicates that 90% of people support the government’s ability to negotiate lower drug prices. Even with lower prices, the pharmaceut­ical industry profits would ensure that the sector remains attractive enough for future investment­s. In addition, the federal government subsidizes drug developmen­t through its funding of research and developmen­t.

Finally, Medicare drug negotiatio­ns would have a direct effect on Virginians. It would save federal dollars, make drugs more affordable for patients and provide an opportunit­y to address other health care issues while increasing accessibil­ity and affordabil­ity within the commonweal­th of Virginia.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States