Daily Press

Resurfacin­g another kind of hip surgery

- Eve Glazier, M.D., MBA; and Elizabeth Ko, M.D. Send questions to askthedoct­ors@mednet.ucla.edu

Dear Doctors: My older brother worked constructi­on his whole life, and now he has bad arthritis in his left hip. He was in enough pain that he finally saw his doctor about it. Instead of a hip replacemen­t, they want to do hip resurfacin­g. What is that? Will it be as effective as a hip replacemen­t?

Dear Reader: Hip resurfacin­g is a type of hip replacemen­t surgery. As with your brother, the most common reason that someone needs this type of surgery is advanced osteoarthr­itis. Also known as “wear-andtear arthritis,” it is common in older adults and among certain profession­s. Osteoarthr­itis of the hip can cause pain that is severe enough to limit mobility and interfere with the activities of daily life.

To understand the difference between traditiona­l hip replacemen­t and hip resurfacin­g, we need to take a closer look at the hip joint. It’s a ball-and-socket joint, which allows for the impressive range of motion we have in our legs. The rounded top of the femur, which is the larger leg bone, forms the ball. This is known as the femoral head. It fits into a cuplike socket in the pelvis, known as the acetabulum. Both the ball and socket are covered with smooth cartilage, which allows them to glide painlessly against each other. In osteoarthr­itis, that cartilage gradually wears away, which makes movement painful. And when nonsurgica­l approaches to managing osteoarthr­itis pain are not successful, hip replacemen­t surgery is often recommende­d.

In a traditiona­l hip replacemen­t, both the femoral head and the acetabulum are removed. They are then replaced with components made of plastic, ceramic and sometimes metal. But in hip resurfacin­g, damaged bone and cartilage from the femoral head and the acetabulum are trimmed away. The surgeon then lines the socket with a metal shell, and covers the femoral head with a smooth metal cap.

Advantages of this procedure over a total hip replacemen­t include more rapid recovery, improved mobility and decreased risk of hip dislocatio­n. It’s also easier to exchange implants if they wear out or fail.

However, there are some drawbacks. One is the risk of a femoral neck fracture, which occurs in a small number of hip resurfacin­g patients. This results in the need for a complete hip replacemen­t. The other is something known as metal ion risk. Because hip resurfacin­g uses two metal components, the resulting friction can, over time, lead to the release of tiny metal molecules. This can cause pain and swelling in the surroundin­g tissues, which can necessitat­e further surgery.

It’s important for your brother to talk about all of this with his surgeon. Getting a second opinion, which can help him weigh the risks and benefits of the two types of hip replacemen­t, can be helpful as well. —

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States