Daily Press

Protecting the vote

As threats amass, Virginia elections officials face a daunting path

-

Protecting election workers and voting systems from interferen­ce this year promises to be an enormous challenge. The threats arrayed against them — from intimidati­on and threats of physical violence, to cyberattac­ks and sabotage efforts conducted by foreign government­s — are wide-ranging and daunting.

It is therefore reassuring to see federal, state and local officials all taking necessary steps to defend voting rolls and elections systems from disruption, and state lawmakers considerin­g measures to deter attacks on elections officials and ensure the integrity of the vote. Success this year will require sound strategies, appropriat­e tools and considerab­le vigilance.

When Virginians head to the polls for Tuesday’s presidenti­al primary, they should have every confidence that the ballots they cast will be fairly evaluated and accurately counted. Despite cries to the contrary, there were no substantia­l allegation­s of voter fraud in the 2020 election and the state Department of Elections maintains the previous presidenti­al vote was the most secure in Virginia history.

Despite that, it’s evident that the sharks are circling.

At a February conference in Washington, D.C, elections officials from across the country heard from federal law enforcemen­t officials and cybersecur­ity experts about a significan­t number of threats conspiring to undermine this year’s presidenti­al election.

The news website Stateline reported on Feb. 14 that elections officials were warned that voter databases could be the target of phishing and ransomware attacks by internatio­nal criminal groups and foreign powers, that violent extremists could target voting sites and election workers, and that the rise of artificial intelligen­ce is an area of greater concern heading into November.

“The threat environmen­t, unfortunat­ely, is very high,” said Tim Langan, executive assistant director for the Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch of the FBI, told the conference. “It is extremely alarming.”

Some of these threats aren’t new, of course. Ample evidence confirmed efforts, both small and large, by foreign government­s to sow division and undermine trust in the election process in 2016. And only four years ago, the nation saw the violence unleashed by lies and misinforma­tion in a highly charged environmen­t, culminatin­g in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The message to election officials last month was to expect more — a lot more — in the coming months.

Many election department­s, here in Virginia and across the nation, have already invested considerab­le time, money and effort in making their systems and facilities more secure in preparatio­n for this presidenti­al election year. They’ve improved cybersecur­ity measures and strengthen­ed relationsh­ips with local law enforcemen­t to bolster safety.

But Virginia has also taken steps that could undermine those efforts, such as needlessly withdrawin­g from a multi-state system that ensures the accuracy of state voter rolls. Virginia Elections Commission­er Susan Beals bowed to baseless conspiracy theories last year in announcing the commonweal­th would leave the Electronic Registrati­on Informatio­n Center, a program that Republican former Gov. Bob McDonnell helped organize.

The General Assembly passed a bill, now awaiting the governor’s signature, that would return Virginia to the program. That’s one of several measures either approved or pending in Richmond that would make tangible improvemen­ts to the integrity of our elections.

Cybersecur­ity represents a different challenge, especially for smaller election department­s with limited resources. The federal Cybersecur­ity and Infrastruc­ture Security Agency recently launched a website — called #Protect202­4 — to put informatio­n and tools in the hands of election officials to secure their systems and prevent intrusions.

These include some well-known tips, such as using multi-factor authentica­tion for email logins to limit vulnerabil­ity, to requesting a security assessment of election facilities by law enforcemen­t and rehearsing an incident response in case of violence.

It is infuriatin­g that elections officials need to be trained on how to respond to attacks or intimidati­on. Sadly, this environmen­t is self-made by those who promote, amplify and engage in lies and misinforma­tion, and who believe that political violence is justifiabl­e.

But Virginia should have confidence that steps are being taken to ensure that November’s election will be safe and secure and that the results, whatever they may be, can be trusted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States