Daily Press

A desire for family time, minus the kids

- Adapted from an online discussion. Email tellme@washpost. com or write “Tell Me About It” c/o The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071

Hi, Carolyn: My sisterin-law lives 10 minutes away, never visits, shows no interest in our kids and doesn’t return my husband’s calls. That’s fine.

But when my in-laws visit the grandkids one weekend a month, she insists on being consulted and included in all plans. If we do something that doesn’t suit her, she does not come or comes significan­tly late and wails that we “are kicking her out of her own family.”

My in-laws are lovely, if conflict-avoidant, people. They now set aside time just for sister-in-law on each trip, and I would like to formally separate the visits going forward. When the in-laws are with us, we’ll invite the sister-inlaw when it makes sense but will not change our plans. Same during her time. My husband worries that we’re being as selfish as his sister and putting his parents in a difficult position. But this is what it means to have boundaries, right? The last visit involved missing much of an event Kid 1 was excited about, then a massive meltdown from Kid 2 due to a dinner delay, so it’s possible I’ve lost some perspectiv­e. — In-Law

Dear In-Law: I feel like

I’m missing something, because there’s an almost ideal solution taking shape here: First, you stick to your schedule during these visits, because going to schedule-disrupting lengths to attempt to please everyone seems over the top when the next visit is just weeks away.

Second, she has a right to see her own parents her own way without always being at the mercy of your kids. Early dinners and youth sports have their charms, don’t get me wrong, but not when they set the family visit agenda for everyone, all the time. That she doesn’t have much of a relationsh­ip with her brother makes her resistance here more rational, not less.

Third, you can keep inviting her in the interest of being inclusive, providing detailed plans, with the understand­ing that she can come or not come, as she wishes, and there will be no guilt penalty either way.

So what am I not seeing? She wants to spend time with her parents and not (always) your kids.

She may be expressing that horribly — passive aggression, wailing, no-showing — but there’s nothing wrong with the underlying preference.

If I were the one without kids who was asking for some non-kid-centric time, I would hate to have my parent-siblings take that as “selfish” of me just because my methods need to grow up. Which brings me to the solution more worthy of the “ideal” tag: for the siblings to have a real conversati­on about how they feel about what, and why. The sister alone seems to have more baggage than she can comfortabl­y carry around.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States