We’ll soon go off daylight saving time. But why?
In the comingweeks, leaves will fall, plants will shrivel, temperatures will sink and Americans will experience growing dread over the unpleasant experience that awaitsU.S. in November. No, not the presidential election— the end of daylight saving time.
Early on the morning afterHalloween, the nation will shift to what is inaccurately known as standard time, though it applies for only about four months of the year. The vast majority of theU.S. will have to reset clocks, adjust sleep times, endure mild symptoms of jet lag and get used to the sudden early onset of darkness. Then, inMarch, we will have to switch back in another round of disruption and aggravation.
It doesn’t have to be thisway. If there is anythingwe’ve learned from this routine, it’s thatwe can structure and manipulate time to suit our needs. The clock, after all, is a human invention.
Within theU.S., daylight saving time has neverwon universal assent. Hawaii and Arizona don’t use it, though it does apply on that chunk of Arizona reserved for theNavajoNation. Indiana used to be a bizarre hodgepodge seemingly designed to drive residents and visitors to the brink of madness.
Until 2006, The Associated Press noted, the state had “77 counties observing Eastern time but not changing clocks; five on Eastern time unofficially observing daylight saving time; and 10 on Central time that observed daylight saving time.” Therewere a lot of missed appointments, late arrivals and panic attacks. In April 2006, the entire state began recognizing daylight saving time.
Florida Republican Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott think the regular switch-overs are notworth the trouble. They’ve introduced the Sunshine Protection Act tomake daylight saving time permanent everywhere yearround. The Florida legislature is one of 13 that have passed legislation to use it 12 months a year, but federal lawforbids any state fromdoing so.
Their measurewould not literally protect sunshine, which will be present for the same interval every 24 hours regardless of what your clock says. Norwould it “save” daylight; it would merely shift it, in effect, from one time of day to another.
Daylight saving timewas made year-round in 1974, during the energy crisis, to reduce gasoline consumption, which it apparently did. But the experimentwas scrapped because it appeared to increase the number of kids being hit by cars on theirway to school.
The mass of evidence, however, indicates thatwe’d be better off ifwe extended daylight saving time to 12 months. In 2007, lawprofessors Steve Calandrillo of theUniversity ofWashington and Dustin Buehler of the University of Arkansas made a comprehensive study of the data and concluded the changewould be a net boon.
Among the benefits they cite: fewer traffic fatalities involving either pedestrians or vehicle occupants, less energy use thanks to a decline in peak electricity demand, reduced crime and, contrary tomyth, no change in the number of schoolchildren killed on theirway to school. If morning darkness is perceived to pose a danger to kids in some places, schools could push back their start times an hour.
As Calandrillo told me by email, “99% of the population is awake in the early evening at sunset andwould benefit froman extra hour of sunlight then. On the contrary, only approximately half of the population is awake at sunrise (sometimes higher, sometimes lower, depending on the time of year), so adding an extra hour of sun in the early morning only benefits half the population.”
TheCOVID-19 pandemic, he notes, has only magnified the appeal of perpetual daylight saving time. A lot of people who nowwork remotely can sleep later than they did when they were commuting. Kids who attend virtual classes don’t have to stand on dark streetswaiting for buses.
Even if extending daylight saving time merely shifted crime and car wrecks fromone time of day to another, itwould at least eliminate the lowlevel turmoil that sweeps the country twice each year. We do our bodies no favors by making them spring forward and fall back. The American Academy of SleepMedicine issued a statement last month recommending doing away with this hybrid system of keeping time.
OnNov. 1, we are scheduled to repeat an exasperating ritual that serves no good purpose. We should make it the last time.