Daily Southtown

Illinois’ criminal justice reform falls short on police accountabi­lity

- By Erika Maye Erika Maye is the deputy senior director of Criminal Justice and Democracy Campaigns at Color Of Change.

Last month, Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed a landmark bill on criminal justice reform, which was championed by the Illinois Legislativ­e Black Caucus and grassroots community groups across the state. This monumental policy package will take crucial steps in advancing racial justice in Illinois by enacting long overdue reforms to anti-Black systems of policing, and revising overly punitive sentencing laws.

But while the passage of the historic legislatio­n has been rightly celebrated as a hard-won victory, the final language included several glaring omissions, particular­ly around limiting the power of police unions, who have been the most steadfast and powerful voices against police accountabi­lity. If the state legislatur­e is truly serious about reform, they must pursue additional legislatio­n to plug these gaps.

Under fierce pressures from Chicago’s Fraternal Order of the Police and the largest public employee labor union in the nation, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the final bill dropped a powerful measure included in the caucus’s original proposal that would have dismantled systems of police impunity in Illinois.

This provision, originally introduced by Rep. Carol Ammons and the Chicago-based Workers Center for Racial Justice as HB 5830, would have prohibited measures in police union contracts that obstruct the open investigat­ion of officer misconduct and thwart efforts to enact meaningful police reform.

Many current police contracts, such as Chicago’s, include provisions that undermine fair investigat­ions of misconduct by allowing accused officers time to review evidence and prepare before an investigat­ion starts and limiting the mechanisms for handing down discipline.

Under the false guise of protecting workers’ rights, AFSCME and the FOP pushed lawmakers to remove the right of Illinois residents to hold the police accountabl­e through open investigat­ions and discipline for officer wrongdoing. This has been the way that police unions and, by extension, police forces have amassed power that allows for rampant systemic misconduct and office impunity.

Since the early 1960s, police unions have weaponized collective bargaining power to create a firewall for police misconduct. Unlike most union contracts that deal explicitly with wages and compensati­on, police collective bargaining agreements include provisions that shield individual officers from investigat­ion into misconduct, provide impunity and, in some cases, allow law enforcemen­t to destroy disciplina­ry records of individual officers. These contracts grant a level of protection enjoyed by no other profession. Doctors can be sued for malpractic­e, lawyers can be disbarred, even your hairstylis­t can lose her license for failure to follow health standards. But police officers, who have powers of life and death, rarely face consequenc­es.

In reality, police contracts undermine public safety by allowing police misconduct to go unchecked, often until it is too late. Jason Van Dyke, the officer convicted in the 2014 murder of Laquan McDonald in Chicago, had at least 10 excessive force complaints against him at the time of the murder — none of which resulted in disciplina­ry action. Tracking by the Citizens Police Data suggests that Van Dyke had more complaints filed against him than 94% of other officers. Police contracts have allowed law enforcemen­t to terrorize Black people with no recourse and no semblance of justice. Communitie­s aren’t safe when anyone is above the law, including police.

As police unions have amassed power through their contracts, they have also been able to undermine any attempts at police reform through threats and fear mongering. Shortly after the introducti­on of ILBC’s reform package, the president of the Illinois Associatio­n of Police Chiefs said that the provisions would “destroy law enforcemen­t’s ability to keep communitie­s safe.” A representa­tive from the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police said the provisions would lead to “frivolous lawsuits” and was punishing good police.

Police unions routinely give political donations to candidates’ campaigns, making legislator­s politicall­y beholden to them. By conservati­ve estimates, Illinois police unions have given at least $376,410 to sitting Illinois state legislator­s. But police unions have also organized walkoffs and slowed their response to 911 calls to put pressure on political officials, a tactic so common it has its own nickname — the “blue flu.”

What’s clear is that with all the praise for reform we heard from lawmakers, many of them still ultimately sided with the police unions. While the Black Caucus was cleareyed about where the real problems are, their allies were not willing to take the hard step of curbing the power of police unions. True reform will not be possible until that work is complete, and lawmakers who want to be celebrated as defending Black lives still have work to do.

 ?? ANTONIO PEREZ/CHICAGO TRIBUNE ?? Gov. J.B. Pritzker answers questions last week at Kennedy King College in Chicago, where he appeared with Mayor Lori Lightfoot and Illinois Legislativ­e Black Caucus members. Pritzker signed the criminal justice reform bill last month.
ANTONIO PEREZ/CHICAGO TRIBUNE Gov. J.B. Pritzker answers questions last week at Kennedy King College in Chicago, where he appeared with Mayor Lori Lightfoot and Illinois Legislativ­e Black Caucus members. Pritzker signed the criminal justice reform bill last month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States