Daily Southtown

Brutalist courthouse makes ‘Most Endangered’ structures list

- Paul Eisenberg

A poorly worded inscriptio­n on a plaque at the base of a monument outside the Old Will County Courthouse implies credit for the monolithic 1969 concrete structure should go to architect J.C. Cochrane, designer of Illinois Capitol and other notable buildings.

He designed the Lake County Courthouse in Crown Point, Indiana, as well, so one doesn’t have to travel all the way to Springfiel­d to discover his busy, classical style doesn’t really fit the imposing flat stone walls of the Joliet edifice.

Also, Cochrane died in 1887, a major impediment to designing postmodern architectu­re.

In the plaque writer’s defense, Cochrane had designed an earlier, much more ornate courthouse for Will County in 1884, where the county’s legal business was handled for 80 years before it was unceremoni­ously demolished to pave the way for the modern structure now known as the old courthouse.

Architect Otto Stark, known for designing the office building at 55 W. Wacker Drive in Chicago, is credited with the design of the 1969 courthouse, which won architectu­re awards at the time.

Stark’s design is appropriat­ely stark, in a style called Brutalist, not because it’s brutal, but because the French term for raw concrete is “beton brut,” and the old courthouse features plenty of that material. It was a popular style in the turbulent late ’60s, especially for government buildings. Much like in Joliet, Lake County’s ornate 1878 courthouse in Waukegan was torn down in 1967 and replaced with a Brutalist-style successor.

A half-century later, Stark’s courthouse in Joliet is facing the same fate as its predecesso­r. Will County officials seem intent on demolishin­g it now that they have a brand new steel and glass courthouse with an award-winning design across the street.

That imminent danger helped put the Old Will County Courthouse on the 2022 list of Most Endangered Historic Places in Illinois, announced last week by the preservati­on advocacy group Landmarks Illinois. It joins the Eugene S. Pike House in Dan Ryan Woods on Chicago’s South Side, the Century & Consumers Buildings on South State Street in Chicago’s Loop, Rockford’s Elks Lodge No. 64 and Gillson Park in Wilmette.

It’s the shortest list in the 25 years Landmarks Illinois has been compiling it, which is encouragin­g to Bonnie McDonald, the organizati­on’s executive director. She said other resources the organizati­on offers have helped make a dent in the number of historic structures at risk due to redevelopm­ent or “demolition by neglect.”

“Our programs around technical assistance and grant funding and resources are growing,” she said. “Because those are growing, the number of endangered properties are shrinking.”

Since issuing the first Most Endangered list in 1995, the group has featured about 300 sites, McDonald said, with about a 50% success rate.

“We think of that as a success because these properties come to us in imminent danger,” she said. “The wrecking ball is coming. They’re deteriorat­ing, and often times it’s seen as a last resort. To have had success with over half of them, we feel like it’s a triumph.”

One of their most proud triumphs isn’t far from the courthouse. The Joliet Penitentia­ry

While it may not fit the profile of most historic structures, the Brutalist courthouse in Joliet has another very important quality that makes its preservati­on paramount, McDonald said — the countless people who have interacted with it over its five decades.

made the list in 2002, just months after its last inmates were transferre­d to other state prisons. In a Tribune story about that year’s list, Landmarks Illinois officials said the prison would be one of the group’s most difficult challenges, requiring “creative thinking to come up with an adaptable use plan for that structure.”

Now called the Old Joliet Prison Historic Site and managed by the Joliet Area Historical Museum, the site is still being stabilized with the help of millions in grant funds while also offering tours and hosting concerts, an annual haunted house and other events.

That success was largely the result of a group of active local supporters, McGrath said, a crucial element to getting on the Most Endangered list.

“We require local support,” she said, “an organizati­on we can work with to ensure success.

“If we have a nomination from a single person, or we find there isn’t a local support base, we will work with whoever we can, but we won’t put it on the Most Endangered list.”

While lots of preservati­on efforts receive grants, resources and other support from Landmarks Illinois, the Most Endangered list is a way to rally public support around an effort as well as generate ideas for showcase projects. Including properties that don’t have a local support, or ones where “the wrecking ball is truly right down the road and (demolition) is a week away” would be counterpro­ductive, McGrath said.

“The purpose of the list is to identify opportunit­ies around these places and address challenges, and find solutions that can be used across the state,” she said. “These are models for other communitie­s.

“We want it to be meaningful and to make a real difference. These are examples of larger issues around the state like public ownership and lack of public funding, owners who are using demolition by neglect, and policy issues. That’s really the purpose of this list.”

Sometimes, it doesn’t work out. Another Brutalist building, the Prentice Women’s Hospital in Chicago, appeared on the Most Endangered list for four consecutiv­e years starting in 2009 before demolition began in 2013.

But McDonald prefers to focus on the success stories, such as Chicago’s James Thompson Center, another regular that came off the list this year after four years now that a sale and renovation plan seemingly have spared it.

The Thompson Center also is encouragin­g because it involves an architectu­ral style that’s just now coming around to being considered historic.

“Not everyone sees postmodern­ism as historic and significan­t,” McDonald said. “How can something built in my lifetime be historic?

“This is really a story about how places gain significan­ce for different generation­s. There’s a large group of people who see Brutalism and postmodern­ism as beautiful and significan­t. They tend to be younger people, under 40. It takes about 60 years for an architectu­ral style to start to have a constituen­cy of support.”

There’s no doubt that being easy on the eyes can help a preservati­on effort along. The Eugene S. Pike House in Chicago’s North Beverly neighborho­od is a stately old home built in 1894 by a prosperous developer whose estate was purchased by the Forest Preserve District of Cook County in 1921, later becoming Dan Ryan Woods. According to its Landmarks listing, the district planned to use the house as a superinten­dent’s headquarte­rs and it eventually became the “Watchman’s Residence” in the 1960s.

Empty for years, the house has had active preservati­on support from the Beverly community, but it needs extensive repairs and a Forest Preserve District effort a few years ago didn’t generate any reuse ideas.

McDonald said district officials are open to saving the structure and working with the community on a renewed effort to find another suitable use for the Pike House.

That kind of partnershi­p isn’t evident with the Old Will County Courthouse, where government officials seem intent on demolition while a group called the Courthouse Preservati­on Partnershi­p is hoping to stave off its doom.

McDonald said Landmarks Illinois still hopes to have “a constructi­ve dialogue” and an opportunit­y to suggest reuse ideas for the old courthouse. But until then, adding the Brutalist structure to this year’s list is a way “to continue to bring that dialogue to the public,” she said.

While it may not fit the profile of most historic structures, the Brutalist courthouse in Joliet has another very important quality that makes its preservati­on paramount, McDonald said — the countless people who have interacted with it over its five decades.

“It tells the story of our community,” she said. “It’s part of the story of the people who live here.”

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States