Daily Southtown

Inspector general: CPD discipline reviews inconsiste­nt

- By Paige Fry pfry@chicagotri­bune.com

A report released by the Office of Inspector General on Thursday found that the agencies that review Chicago police misconduct cases cannot ensure procedural fairness and consistenc­y.

The agencies that investigat­e misconduct allegation­s are CPD’s bureau of internal affairs or the Civilian Office of Police Accountabi­lity. If either agency finds that a CPD member committed misconduct, then the agency recommends a disciplina­ry penalty.

That recommenda­tion then goes through a review process.

The Police Board may also review the recommenda­tion depending on the rank of the CPD member and nature of the discipline.

The inspector general found that neither agency’s policies contain clear and actionable guidance on how its investigat­ors should weigh aggravatin­g and mitigating factors when deciding disciplina­ry recommenda­tions, according to the report.

The Police Board also does not have any formal policies to consistent­ly and fairly determine discipline, the report said.

“BIA and COPA’s policies do not provide sufficient guidance on how, when, and in what measure those agencies should consider aggravatin­g and mitigating factors in reaching disciplina­ry recommenda­tions, risking approaches that vary widely across investigat­ions and may therefore be inconsiste­nt and unfair,” according to the report.

“COPA’s policies, specifical­ly, contain internally contradict­ory and outdated language. The Police Board does not have any formal policies in place at all to ensure that its determinat­ions of final discipline are made consistent­ly and fairly across all cases it considers.”

The inspector general recommende­d that COPA and internal affairs should revise its policies to require that personnel developing disciplina­ry recommenda­tions must document that they have considered whether any mitigating and aggravatin­g factors are relevant to the determinat­ion of recommende­d discipline, according to the report.

It also recommende­d that representa­tives from both agencies and the Police Board should solicit feedback from each other and CPD unions to come up with a standardiz­ed list of aggravatin­g and mitigating factors, and the list should be made publicly available, the report said.

In response to the recommenda­tions, CPD reported that it is revising a number of its relevant orders and trainings for those who work in internal affairs, the report said.

COPA agreed with the inspector general’s recommenda­tions and indicated that it’s also revising relevant policies and guidance materials.

The Police Board disagreed with the recommenda­tion that it should consult with CPD and COPA, the report said.

The board pointed to its views of the importance of independen­ce from the agencies.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States