Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Keep your eyes, wallet on California, home of tax revolt

- By Lowman Henry Times Guest Columnist

Given its well-earned reputation as a haven for the tax-and-spend crowd most would look at California as an unlikely place for a tax revolt. But recent increases in gas taxes and vehicle fees have finally pushed the overburden­ed citizens of the Golden state to the breaking point.

Pennsylvan­ians, who in recent years have seen 30-cents per gallon added in taxes on gasoline, might scoff at the California gas tax increase of 12-cents per gallon. But coupled with other fees the hikes are costing the average California family an additional $779 per year.

That has stoked outrage that has resulted in over one million voters signing a petition to place a question on the upcoming November ballot to rescind the hikes.

It also cost one lawmaker his job.

In addition to enjoying referendum rights, California­ns also have the ability to recall legislator­s. That is exactly what happened in the recent primary election when Democrat Josh Newman, who cast one of the deciding votes in passing the gas tax hike, was recalled. And it wasn’t even close – he lost by 20 percent.

Polling shows the propositio­n that would strike down the gas tax and fee hikes has a better than even chance of passing. At this early stage that is significan­t in a state where tax hikes are viewed as a positive thing by a substantia­l portion of the electorate.

California though is no stranger to tax revolts. Back in 1978 a group of voters upset with high property taxes secured enough signatures to get the People’s Initiative to Limit Property Taxation, or Propositio­n 13, on the ballot. Led by Howard Jarvis, the movement succeeded in cutting and limiting property taxes and sparked a nationwide wave of anti-tax efforts.

Propositio­n 13, and the anti-tax era it ushered in, is also widely credited with adding fuel to the long-shot presidenti­al campaign of a former movie actor and California governor, Ronald Reagan. Reagan, of course, made tax cuts a centerpiec­e of his presidency. Those cuts in turn produced one of the longest periods of economic expansion in American history.

Meanwhile, back here in Penn’s Woods, the massive increase in gasoline taxes put into effect under former Gov. Tom Corbett continues to have political implicatio­ns. Since those increases were phased in over three years it took consumers a while to feel the total impact. Eventually, the tax hike on producers was passed along to consumers. Today, Pennsylvan­ia motorists shoulder one of the highest gas tax burdens in the nation.

Tom Corbett is long gone, having been the first incumbent governor in state history to lose a reelection bid. But legislator­s who voted for the hike on gasoline producers are still feeling the sting. In May’s primary election the lone sitting state senator to lose re-election was Randy Vulakovich. His opponent, Ross Township Commission­er Jeremy Shaffer, made Vulakovich’s gas tax vote a key issue in the campaign.

Shaffer won in a landslide despite the fact senate Republican leaders poured a ton of money into Vulakovich’s campaign. The impact will be wide-ranging: no longer can leaders promise to insulate reluctant members from voter wrath when they make unpopular votes. The potency of the gas tax issue now proven, it will likely be used against other incumbents in future election cycles.

Unfortunat­ely for those of us in Pennsylvan­ia we lack both the rights to initiative and recall enjoyed by residents of California. Therefore there is no way to roll back the Corbettera gas tax and fee hikes except by act of the Legislatur­e. That, of course, will never happen. Already officials at the Pennsylvan­ia Department of Transporta­tion are saying they need even more money than the hundreds of millions generated from those increases.

What is also unlikely to happen, in either Pennsylvan­ia or California, is for transporta­tion agencies to reform themselves. In Pennsylvan­ia, public transporta­tion – notably the Southeaste­rn Pennsylvan­ia Transit Authority (SEPTA) – remains a haven for patronage, union excess and inefficien­cy.

Motorists who never set foot on a SEPTA bus or train subsidize the cost in the form of taxes and even Pennsylvan­ia Turnpike toll revenue. SEPTA, and the Port Authority Transit (PAT) in Pittsburgh are always in Harrisburg with their hands out for more money. Yet reforms never happen.

Pennsylvan­ia voters should keep a close eye on California and the November initiative to roll back that state’s gas tax hike. Perhaps once again California­ns will ignite a tax revolt that will sweep across the fruited plain to Penn’s Woods. Lowman S. Henry is Chairman & CEO of the Lincoln Institute and host of the weekly Lincoln Radio Journal. His e-mail address is lhenry@ lincolnins­titute.org.

 ??  ?? Pennsylvan­ia continues to pay some of the highest gas taxes in the nation.
Pennsylvan­ia continues to pay some of the highest gas taxes in the nation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States