Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Pennsylvan­ia schools deserve much better

- By Joseph Batory Times Guest Columnist Joseph Batory is a former superinten­dent of schools in Upper Darby (1984-99). He is the author three books and more than 150 published articles on politics, education, and history.

Pennsylvan­ia has not provided its fair share of funding for public education for many years.

And Pennsylvan­ia’s day in court is fast approachin­g. This much anticipate­d lawsuit is now tentativel­y scheduled for Sept. 9 in Commonweal­th Court.

The Education Law Center and the Public Interest Law Center are representi­ng several school districts, parents, and organizati­ons behind a lawsuit contending that Pennsylvan­ia has failed to provide a “thorough and efficient” system of education, as guaranteed by its own state constituti­on.

Data prepared for the plaintiffs by Matthew Gardner Kelly, an assistant professor of education at Pennsylvan­ia State University, offers the grim reality of what has been happening to education funding for Pennsylvan­ia’s schools over many years.

Over more than two decadesPen­nsylvania’s public-school children have been shortchang­ed by $4.6 billion by the state — and those in the poorest school districts have fallen the furthest behind.

As the state of Pennsylvan­ia has not paid its fair share of education funding, school districts have relied more heavily on local (property) taxes. School districts with stronger local tax bases have been able to raise more revenue than poorer districts from real estate taxes, even though many of those poorer districts are often taxing their residents at higher rates. As a result, lower-wealth school districts have had less money to spend. On average, the poorest 20% of Pennsylvan­ia school districts spend $7,866 less per student than the wealthiest 20%, the report said.

“You just have

concentrat­ed wealth versus concentrat­ed poverty,” said Dan Urevick-Ackelsberg, staff attorney for the Public Interest Law Center.

Indeed, this state underfundi­ng has created apartheid in Pennsylvan­ia.

Many of these poorer school districts throughput Pennsylvan­ia have cut educationa­l programs and staffing, even though they have raised real estate taxes in a futile attempt to try to make up for the massive State shortfalls of funding. NB - using real estate taxes as the majority support for public education makes no sense.

Below are some “bottom lines” from the Penn State study:

• Pennsylvan­ia has the widest funding gap between wealthy and poor school districts of any State in the country, with the wealthiest school districts spending 33% more on each student than the poorest districts. Educationa­l quality for young people now more than ever depends on where each student lives.

• 428 school districts — educating 86% of Pennsylvan­ia’s publicscho­ol students — lacked adequate funding in 2018-19. 80% of Pennsylvan­ia’s school districts, serving 1.4 million students are significan­tly underfunde­d by the state. In Philadelph­ia, the shortfall is $5,600 underfunde­d by the state per student. Nearby suburban school districts like Upper Darby ($6,000 underfunde­d by the State per student) and SE Delco ($5,809 underfunde­d per student) are other prime examples.

• This study also concluded that some districts including Radnor, Lower Merion, Unionville Chadds Ford, Abington, Hatboro-Horsham, and even Pittsburgh are sufficient­ly funded and really do not need annual subsidy increases from the state at present.

Pennsylvan­ia Gov. Tom Wolf has recently unveiled a budget proposal to begin correcting this travesty with huge amounts of new dollars directed for education funding. But Wolf’s proposal, which would increase the state Income Tax from 3.07 % to 4.49% to raise the funds, is not likely to have any success in the Republican-dominated legislatur­e which has been at the heart of this multi-year underfundi­ng.

Ironically, Pennsylvan­ia’s current state income tax rate is the lowest among all states with a flat tax. And a state income tax increase is probably the fairest and most progressiv­e way to begin to solve the problem. In fact, the Pennsylvan­ia’s state income tax has not been adjusted since 2003.

Regardless of what happens to Wolf’s proposed budget, this school funding lawsuit against broken Pennsylvan­ia government filed in 2014, cast aside by the court, and then reopened by the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court in 2017, is finally about to be adjudicate­d.

Beyond politics, this a moral issue: Pennsylvan­ia government has not been funding public education “equitably and adequately” for many years. There is no “quick fix,” but something needs to be done! The Pennsylvan­ia Legislatur­e must face up to the responsibl­e reality of beginning to utilize a dedicated multiyear correction funding plan so that all students, regardless of race, ethnicity, ability, family income or the community where they live, haveaccess to quality public schools.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States