Dayton Daily News

IRS Silence speaks volumes in inquiry of IRS conduct

- George F. Will writes for The Washington Post Writers Group. Email address: georgewill@washpost.com.

narrow the permissibl­e amount of this.

Lerner is, so far, the face of this use of government to punish political adversarie­s. She knows what her IRS unit did and how it intersects with the law, and for a second time she has exercised her constituti­onal right to remain silent rather than risk selfincrim­ination. The public has a right to make reasonable inferences from her behavior.

And from Obama’s. After calling the IRS behavior “outrageous,” he now says there is not a “smidgen” of evidence of anything to be outraged about. He knows this even though the supposed investigat­ion of the IRS behavior has not been completed, or perhaps even begun. The person he chose to investigat­e his administra­tion is an administra­tion employee and a generous donor to his campaigns.

Obama breezily says there was nothing more sinister than “boneheaded decisions” by wayward and anonymous IRS underlings. Certainly boneheaded­ness explains much about this administra­tion. Still, does he consider it interestin­g that the consequenc­es of IRS boneheaded­ness were not randomly distribute­d, but thwarted conservati­ves?

Speaking of questions: Can anyone identify a Democratic Senate candidate whose tax records were leaked, as Christine O’Donnell’s were when she was the Republican candidate in Delaware in 2010? Is it a coincidenc­e that in January 2011, after Catherine Engelbrech­t requested tax-exempt status for two conservati­ve groups she founded in Texas — King Street Patriots and True the Vote — the Engelbrech­t family business was notified of its first IRS audit?

This column has previously noted that in 1996 a Republican Senate candidate called the FEC to dispute campaign finance charges made by Democrats. The head of the FEC’s enforcemen­t division told the Republican: “Promise me you will never run for office again, and we will drop this case.” So spoke Lois Lerner.

There almost certainly are people, above her and beyond the IRS, who initiated or approved the IRS’ punitive targeting of conservati­ve groups, and who hope Lerner’s history of aggressive partisansh­ip will cause investigat­ors to conclude that she is as high as responsibi­lity for the targeting rises. Those people should hire criminal defense attorneys.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States