Dayton Daily News

Ohio faculty could face scrutiny

Teachers at public universiti­es call bill ‘very puzzling.’

- By Max Filby Staff Writer

Tenured faculty at Ohio’s public universiti­es could face state mandated evaluation­s and minimum teaching requiremen­ts if bills in the statehouse become law.

There is currently no state statute dictating requiremen­ts or evaluation­s for tenure but if House Bill 66 is becomes law, it would require tenured professors to teach a minimum of three credit hours per semester.

“It’s an attack on faculty,” said John McNay, president of the Ohio chapter of the American Associatio­n of University Professors and a history professor at the University of Cincinnati.

“The whole thing is very puzzling.”

Up to 20 percent of professors per academic program would be eligible for an exemption to the teaching requiremen­t if the university agrees that a faculty member is “significan­tly better suited to research.”

Exempted faculty and the program chair would have to submit a written report outlining how the faculty member would alternativ­ely con

tribute to the “undergradu­ate mission.”

When faculty join a university’s administra­tion they often retain a faculty spot, mean-

ing the bill could force university presidents and other high leaders back into the class- room. The idea of administra­tors teaching and running the school at the same time is a bad idea, McNay said.

“We need these people to actually be able to focus on their job,” McNay said.

The bill, which is before the house’s higher educa- tion and workforce devel

opment committee, would also implement standards for annual performanc­e reviews, according to an analysis of the legislatio­n.

Each university is currently responsibl­e for providing their own guidelines and requiremen­ts to tenured professors, the bill’s sponsor Ron Young told the committee. Young, R-Leroy

Twp., could not be reached to comment.

“We took a step back and looked at what was the p urpose of our higher education system and

tenure in general and decided to take a holistic approach,” Young said in testimony to the com- mittee last week.

Faculty who fail to show their contributi­on to the “undergradu­ate mission” would be subject to a remediatio­n program.

After the first infraction,a faculty member and depart- ment head would need to develop corrective plan, according to a bill summary. Tenured faculty who fail two reviews in a row would be prohibited from taking sabbatical, participat­ing in any “faculty improvemen­t program” and be blocked from requesting a reduction in teaching schedule, accord

ing to bill summary. A third infraction would allow the university to revoke tenure.

The proposals are a reflec- tion of a false notion that tenured faculty cannot be fired, said McNay.

“There’s this impression that once you have this job,

you have it for life,” McNay said. “That’s simply not true.”

Faculty who are on medical or personal

leave, on active duty in the U.S. armed forces or are involved in a faculty exchange program would not be subject to an annual review, according to an analysis of the bill.

House Bill 49, the state budget proposal that passed the house on May 2, would require the board of trustees at state institutio­ns to update

their policies on faculty tenure. The goal of forcing col- leges to review their policies is to “promote excellence in

instructio­n, research, service and commercial­ization,” according to an analysis of the proposal.

State leaders are consider- ing the tenure requiremen­ts to “ensure that our students have the best teaching fac- ulty,” said State Rep. Niraj Antani, R-Miami Twp., who is

vice chairman of the higher education and workforce developmen­t committee.

“There should be a system of accountabi­lity at our universiti­es

that benefit our students,” Antani said.

McNay fe a rs that such state mandated requiremen­ts would strip unions of their negotiatin­g powers while

A nt a ni is worried new laws could have the oppo

s ite effect a nd result in “increased unionizati­on.”

If the bills become law, they would not affect contracts already in place but would have an impact on future agreements.

Provisions that would be required by the bills, such as workloads and reviews, are typically always part of contract negotiatio­ns, said Martin Kich, president of Wright State University’s AAUP chapter and vice president of the Ohio conference. Wright State’s faculty union is in the middle of a contract negotiatio­n right now.

“In every contract there’s already a provision for tenure review,” Kich said. “It’s not like you’re just guaranteed this job forever.”

 ??  ?? State Rep. Niraj Antani
State Rep. Niraj Antani
 ??  ?? State Rep. Ron Young
State Rep. Ron Young
 ??  ?? John McNay
John McNay

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States