Dayton Daily News

Trump immigratio­n plan draws Schumer criticism

Minority leader calls proposal ‘wish list’ for hard-liners.

- By Zeke Miller, Jill Colvin and Alan Fram

The Senate’s WASHINGTON — top Democrat dismissed President Donald Trump’s immigratio­n proposal as a “wish list” for hard-liners on Friday as the plan drew harsh reviews from Democrats, immigratio­n activists and some conservati­ves.

Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., expressed satisfacti­on that Trump had clarified his immigratio­n goals, which have befuddled members of both parties and hindered progress in Congress. The White House plan unveiled Thursday offers a pathway to citizenshi­p for 1.8 million young immigrants living in the U.S. illegally in exchange for major restrictio­ns on legal immigratio­n and $25 billion in border security.

In a pair of tweets, Schumer expressed relief that Trump “finally acknowledg­ed that the Dreamers should be allowed to stay here and become citizens,” a reference to those young immigrants. But he said Trump’s plan “uses them as a tool to tear apart our legal immigratio­n system and adopt the wish list that anti-immigratio­n hardliners have advocated for for years.”

Trump shot back with his own tweet, accusing Schumer of complicati­ng the process. “DACA has been made increasing­ly difficult by the fact that Cryin’ Chuck Schumer took such a beating over the shutdown that he is unable to act on immigratio­n!” he wrote.

The opposition was shared by some on the right, including conservati­ve figure Richard Viguerie, who labeled the White House proposal the “Trump Amnesty Disaster” in an email. Roy Beck, the president of Numbers-USA, which seeks to limit legal immigratio­n, called it a framework for “a mass amnesty.”

Senior White House officials cast the plan as a centrist compromise that could win support from both parties and enough votes to pass the Senate.

The plan would provide a pathway to citizenshi­p for the roughly 690,000 younger immigrants protected from deportatio­n by the Obamaera Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program — as well as hundreds of thousands of others who qualify for the program, but never applied.

Trump announced last year that he was doing away with the program, but he gave Congress until March to come up with a legislativ­e fix.

The plan would not allow parents of those immigrants to seek lawful status, the officials said.

In exchange, Trump’s plan would dramatical­ly overhaul the legal immigratio­n system. Immigrants would only be allowed to sponsor their spouses and underage children to join them in the U.S., and not their parents, adult children or siblings. The officials said it would only end new applicatio­ns for visas, allowing those already in the pipeline to be processed. Still, immigratio­n activists said the move could cut legal immigratio­n in half.

It would end a visa lottery aimed at diversity, which drew Trump’s attention after the New York City truck attack last year, redirectin­g the allotment to bringing down the existing backlog in visa applicatio­ns.

It also includes other measures, such as more money for enforcemen­t and proposed rule changes that would make it easier for the government to deport other groups— measures that advocates argue trade the fate of some immigrants for others.

The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the plan before its release.

Under the plan, recipients could have their legal status revoked due to criminal behavior or national security threats, the officials said, and eventual citizenshi­p would require still-unspecifie­d work and education requiremen­ts — and a finding that the immigrants are of “good moral character.”

Trump ended the DACA program in September, setting a March 5 deadline for Congress to provide new legal protection­s. The officials said their plan is the only one Trump will sign and that, if a solution is not found, former DACA recipients who come into contact with law enforcemen­t will be subject to deportatio­n.

Trump earlier this month had deferred to a bipartisan group in the House and Senate to craft an immigratio­n proposal, saying he would sign whatever they passed. But as talks on Capitol Hill broke down — in part because of controvers­y Trump ginned up using vulgar language to describe African countries — the White House decided to offer its own framework.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States