Dayton Daily News

Kasich’s lasting legacy: Medicaid expansion

- Thomas Suddes Thomas Suddes is an adjunct assistant professor at Ohio University. Send email to tsuddes@gmail.com.

Governors leave legacies. Some are programs. Some are policies. And sometimes a legacy is how he (someday, she) campaigned to win the governorsh­ip, a job the Ohio Constituti­on says holds “the supreme executive power of this state.”

Republican John R. Kasich’s two-term governorsh­ip will end Jan. 14. And there’s a strong case to be made that Ohio’s Medicaid expansion, an incontesta­bly positive move, which Kasich got done despite the opposition of some other Statehouse Republican­s, will be seen as his lasting legacy.

All told, abut 663,000 Ohioans were enrolled in Medicaid expansion coverage in June. That’s about 41,000 fewer than were enrolled in July 2017.

Data marshalled by state Medicaid Director Barbara Sears and state Budget Director Timothy S. Keen supply evidence of Medicaid expansion’s statewide benefits.

First off, and just one example: Expansion has reduced the proportion of Ohioans who are uninsured. If that prompts a shrug, ask someone from your hometown hospital’s board or leadership about the cost of emergency room visits (costs to the taxpayer) by uninsured people as opposed to the costs of an office visit to a primary care doctor.

Then there’s this facet, highlighte­d by Keen’s Budget Office: “[Medicaid] expansion is a sig- nificantly better financial deal for [Ohio] than traditiona­l Medicaid.” Reason: Because of budget offsets (costs averted, or revenues gained, because of the expansion). That means Ohio’s federally required 10 percent match for expanded Medicaid in the fiscal year ending in June 2021 (halfway into the next governor’s term) will actually net out at a 3.2 percent match, Keen said.

Moreover, there’s this telling facet: As of last November, Medicaid expansion clients (as a percentage of all adults ages 19-64) was ranged from 11.3 percent to 14.5 percent in counties that have suffered job losses in manufactur­ing, such as Clark (Springfiel­d), Cuyahoga (Cleveland); Jefferson (Steubenvil­le); Mahoning (Youngstown); and Trumbull (Warren).

But the same 11.3 percent to 14.5 percent range of Medicaid expansion enrollment also was true for a cluster of three east-central counties – Coshocton; Guernsey (Cambridge); and Muskingum (Zanesville) – and in a dozen counties south of Columbus, from Fayette (Washington Court House), Hocking (Logan) and Ross (Chillicoth­e), on south to the Ohio River.

Republican­s represent all 15 of those east-central and southern counties in the General Assembly. And Republican­s run Ohio’s House 66-33 and the state Senate 24-9. Both of those majorities are vetoproof. Some of those legislator­s have groused about Medicaid expansion. But neither the Ohio House nor the state Senate has overturned Medicaid expansion because Republican state legislator­s know how much Medicaid expansion benefits their General Assembly districts.

That hasn’t kept some Ohio Republican­s from grousing that John Kasich is at best a marginal Republican because he expanded Medicaid coverage — hardly something a conservati­ve would do. They might want to brush up on what “Mr. Republican” — the first Robert A. Taft (1889-1953), grandfathe­r of Gov. Bob Taft — thought. The senator was a leading conservati­ve, a key reason that the GOP’s Eastern Establishm­ent repeatedly denied Sen. Taft the GOP’s presidenti­al nomination.

Sen. Taft said this in a 1946 speech: “Those unable to pay for medical care undoubtedl­y fail to get it in many cases where it would be of substantia­l benefit to them ... We have always recognized the obligation of a government to provide free medical care to those unable to pay for it themselves.”

That is, although self-defined Statehouse conservati­ves may not know it, John Kasich, by aiming to assure Ohioans’ access to health care, is on the same page as Robert A. Taft.

Expansion has reduced the proportion of Ohioans who are uninsured . ... Ask someone from your hometown hospital’s board or leadership about the cost of emergency room visits (costs to the taxpayer) by uninsured people as opposed to the costs of an office visit to a primary care doctor.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States