Dayton Daily News

Trump racks up successes in hard-line foreign policy

- Marc A. Thiessen

In his new book “Fear,” Bob Woodward recounts that in April 2017, after President Trump saw images of dead Syrian children with their mouths foaming from a sarin attack, he called Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and issued an order: Get me a plan for a military strike to take out Syrian President Bashar Assad.

“Let’s (expletive) kill him!” Trump told Mattis, according to the book. “Let’s go in.” Mattis, Woodward writes, assured the president that “he would get right on it.” But as soon as Mattis hung up the phone, he told a senior aide: “We’re not going to do any of that.” Instead, Woodward says, the defense secretary gave Trump options for more-limited strikes.

Today, as Assad menaces 3 million civilians in the last rebel stronghold, the Idlib province, it’s clear that Trump’s instinct was right. We should have taken out the Syrian dictator last year.

When Trump was elected in 2016, many worried that he would usher in a new age of American isolationi­sm and withdrawal. That hasn’t happened. Trump has pursued a foreign policy that is not only not isolationi­st but also a significan­t improvemen­t over his predecesso­r’s.

In Syria, while Trump did not eliminate Assad, he did enforce President Barack Obama’s red line against the use of chemical weapons, punishing violations not once but twice — and restoring America’s credibilit­y on the world stage. Last week, Trump launched the U.S.-led coalition’s assault on the Islamic State’s last stronghold on the Syrian-Iraqi border, which will eliminate its physical caliphate. The Post reports that the president has approved a new strategy that “indefinite­ly extends the military effort” in Syria until a government acceptable to all Syrians is establishe­d and all Iranian forces are driven out.

In Israel, Trump moved the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, which he recognized as the country’s capital — something three of his predecesso­rs promised, but failed, to do. He also withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and refocused U.S. efforts in the Middle East on shoring up relations with allies such as Israel and Saudi Arabia instead of courting Iran.

Trump has also taken a surprising­ly tough line with Russia. He approved a massive arms and aid package for Ukraine, expelled 60 Russian diplomats and authorized new sanctions against Moscow at least four times. And the Trump administra­tion recently warned Russia that it would face “total economic isolation” if Moscow backed the Assad regime’s assault in Idlib.

The list of good foreign-policy moves goes on. Trump has taken a strong stand against the narco-dictatorsh­ip in Venezuela, and his administra­tion even considered supporting coup plotters seeking to remove the Maduro regime. He strengthen­ed NATO by getting allies to kick in billions more toward the alliance’s collective security. He declared war on the Internatio­nal Criminal Court, which purports to have jurisdicti­on over U.S. soldiers and citizens even though America is not a signatory to the treaty creating the ICC.

Liberals might not like any of these developmen­ts, but long-standing policy goals of conservati­ve internatio­nalists are being achieved. There may be chaos in the Trump White House, but so far at least the chaos is producing pretty good results.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States