Pres­i­dent’s at­tempt to limit asy­lum con­tested

Dayton Daily News - - NATION & WORLD - By Colleen Long

Pres­i­dent WASH­ING­TON —

Don­ald Trump is­sued an or­der Fri­day to deny asy­lum to mi­grants who en­ter the coun­try il­le­gally, tight­en­ing the bor­der as car­a­vans of Cen­tral Amer­i­cans slowly ap­proach the United States. The plan was im­me­di­ately chal­lenged in court.

Trump in­voked the same pow­ers he used last year to im­pose a travel ban that was up­held by the Supreme Court. The new reg­u­la­tions are in­tended to cir­cum­vent laws stat­ing that any­one is el­i­gi­ble for asy­lum no mat­ter how he or she en­ters the coun­try. About 70,000 peo­ple per year who en­ter the coun­try il­le­gally claim asy­lum, of­fi­cials said.

“We need peo­ple in our coun­try but they have to come in le­gally,” Trump said Fri­day as he de­parted for Paris.

The Amer­i­can Civil Lib­er­ties Union and other le­gal groups swiftly sued in fed­eral court in North­ern Cal­i­for­nia to block the reg­u­la­tions, ar­gu­ing the mea­sures were clearly il­le­gal.

“The pres­i­dent is sim­ply try­ing to run roughshod over Con­gress’s de­ci­sion to pro­vide asy­lum to those in dan­ger re­gard­less of the man­ner of one’s en­try,” said ACLU at­tor­ney Lee Gel­ernt.

The lit­i­ga­tion also seeks to put the rules on hold while the lit­i­ga­tion pro­gresses.

It wasn’t clear whether the case would go be­fore a judge be­fore the rules go into ef­fect Satur­day. They would be in place for at least three months but could be ex­tended, and don’t af­fect peo­ple al­ready in the coun­try.

Trump’s an­nounce­ment was the lat­est push to en­force a hard-line stance on im­mi­gra­tion through reg­u­la­tory changes and pres­i­den­tial or­ders, by­pass­ing Con­gress, which has not passed any im­mi­gra­tion law re­form. But those ef­forts have been largely thwarted by le­gal chal­lenges and, in the case of fam­ily sep­a­ra­tions this year, stymied by a global out­cry that prompted Trump to re­treat.

“The ar­rival of large num­bers ... will con­trib­ute to the over­load­ing of our im­mi­gra­tion and asy­lum sys­tem and to the re­lease of thou­sands ... into the in­te­rior of the United States,” Trump said in the procla­ma­tion, call­ing it a cri­sis.

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials said those de­nied asy­lum un­der the procla­ma­tion may be el­i­gi­ble for sim­i­lar forms of pro­tec­tion if they fear re­turn­ing to their coun­tries, though they would be sub­ject to a tougher thresh­old. Those forms of pro­tec­tion in­clude “with­hold­ing of re­moval” — which is sim­i­lar to asy­lum, but doesn’t al­low for green cards or bring­ing fam­i­lies — or pro­tec­tion un­der the United Na­tions Con­ven­tion Against Tor­ture.

Home­land Se­cu­rity of­fi­cials said they were adding staffing at the bor­der cross­ings to man­age the ex­pected crush, but it’s not clear how mi­grants, specif­i­cally fam­i­lies, would be held as their cases are ad­ju­di­cated.

RE­BECCA BLACK­WELL / AS­SO­CI­ATED PRESS

A group of Cen­tral Amer­i­can mi­grants march to­ward the of­fice of the United Na­tions’ hu­mans rights body in Mex­ico City on Thurs­day.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.