'It's a constant reminder of the sexual assault'
Small-town dilemma: Keeping attackers away from their victims.
MORROW The 64-year-old jog— ger who was attacked on the Little Miami Trail last year can’t understand why she has to keep seeing her attacker in the small town where they live just 1.7 miles apart.
“This is in my face every day of my life,” the victim said during a hearing last week in Warren County Common Pleas Court. “For me to go anywhere, I have to go by where he lives.”
“It’s a constant reminder of the sexual assault.”
The case illustrates the difficult balance the courts try to strike between protecting victims and packing an already crowded prison system with sex offenders. It also shows how chance encounters between offenders and victims are far more likely when both live in the same small town.
In July 2017, the victim, who was using the trail to practice for a triathlon, heard a “guttural sound” and was grabbed by Barry Motz, a one-time conv icted sex offender, who lunged from the brush with his pants down. She was able to break free and run back to her car.
“I am sorry,” he reportedly said after she escaped him.
Motz was arrested three months later and served 119 days in jail while awaiting trial. In February, he pleaded guilty to gross sexual
imposition and faced up to 18 months in prison.
Instead of sending Motz to prison, Warren County Judge Donald Oda II sentenced him to complete an in-patient treatment program and submit to electronic monitoring after returning to the community and being designated a Tier II sex offender.
In explaining his decision, Oda said he hoped Motz could control his behavior rather than coming out of prison “worse than when you went in.”
Motz’s lawyer, Timothy McKenna, also argued that a forensic evaluation showed Motz had mental problems best handled through ther- apy sessions attended while on probation.
Motz was back in Oda’s courtroom last week, as Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell requested that Motz be forced to move from a house owned by his family along U.S. 22 & Ohio 3.
Both Motz and the victim live in the Morrow area, which has a population of roughly 1,300 people.
Motz said he would speak to his family about finding a new place to live, but he also said he has already moved once to accommodate the court.
There are no allegations that Motz has violated any terms of his probation or was following or stalking the vic- tim, according to the victim and probation officers overseeing Motz.
Sex offender registry
Motz is among more than 17,300 adult offenders listed in the Ohio sex offender registry, according to the Ohio Attorney General’s Office.
Under Ohio law, all sex offenders must register with law enforcement and remain on a state list anywhere from 15 years to a lifetime depending which tier they are on.
The law also limits where sex offenders can live. They are prohibited from living or loitering near schools, day care centers or anywhere chil- dren gather, as well as from the victim.
The law itself is controver- sial. Barb Wright, an advocate with Ohio Rational Sexual Offense Laws, said one of the problems is the crimi- nal justice system is expected to keep track of more than 17,000 offenders — the vast majority, she says, who are unlikely to “re-offend.”
She pointed to research funded by the U.S. Department of Justice that calls for more research to determine whether registration was effective.
“Research to date has exhibited mixed results,” according to the conclusion of the Sex offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative Research Brief published in July 2015.
“We need to do a better job of determining who is at risk,” Wright said, adding, “In this circumstance, if this guy is high risk, I don’t blame the victim. This is a scary offense when it occurs.”
Unintended consequences
During last week’s hear- ing, Oda told the victim he had received her letters about the problem and was “open to any and all solutions in this case.”
He assured her Motz was not “a direct risk” to her.
“I don’t know that I have a good option other than what we are doing now,” Oda said. “It is much better to have a bad situation that we are monitoring rather than a situation where Mr. Motz is driven underground or he absconds. Or worst-case scenario, he reoffends.”
According to the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, research shows up to half the offenders subjected to community notification “experience unintended consequences such as job loss, housing instability, threats or harassment, vigilantism, or property damage. About 19 percent of adult sex offenders report that these negative consequences have affected other members of their households.”
The victim says fear of running into Motz has impacted her ability to go to the gym or to the grocery story.
“It’s not something as the victim that I feel I should be subjected to,” she said, noting she had returned to therapy since Motz returned to the Morrow area. “Right now, I still don’t have a way that I can feel comfortable.”
Motz was arrested based on a DNA match with clothing the victim was wearing at the time of the attack, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources investigative report shows. The DNA findings also matched a submission from a January 2014 rape investi- gation in Goshen, according to the report.
In July 2014, Motz was con- victed of sexual imposition in Warren County.
Given the circumstances, Assistant County Prosecutor Carrie Heisele said last week, forcing Motz to move is “a small thing we could request.”
Changes unlikely
Ohio’s sex offender law has undergone changes through t he years, but none are expected before the current session winds up in another week.
One proposed change in the registry law would add prohi- bitions for anyone convicted of criminal child enticement, classifying the crime as a Tier I sex offense when committed by a registered sex offender.
House Bill 374 had one hear- ing in the Criminal Justice Committee in November 2017, but no action has been taken since. The session is sched- uled to end on Dec. 19.