Readers weigh in on land use, tobacco sales

Opposed to development of prairie land

I oppose the development of the prairie mentioned in the Dayton Daily News recently.

At a time when federal protection for the environment and species is being reversed, stripped of authority, defunded, and ignored, it has become necessary for local governments to stand firm on these issues.

We have a precious resource, the wetlands at the source of Stillwater River. The contribution made to water quality by such areas cannot be exaggerated. In an area of the state where water quality is a proud bragging point, it is totally irresponsible to take any action that might negate this natural barrier to pollution and erosion.

The number of insects and animals who live in the wetlands and the prairie would make an astoundingly long list. While they are protected, they provide an opportunity for study and research. What will we study and learn from in a runoff drainage pipe extending from a massive concrete building?

This area should be preserved and development situated elsewhere. This unique remnant of land needs to be proudly protected from the pollutants that surround it, not made part of industrial development. There are other areas in the business park that could be used. There are abandoned industrial sites in neighboring Vandalia, and also just down I-75 in West Dayton. Save us from expensive cleanup and new pollution by keeping industry in areas available for redevelopment.

We must start thinking more long-range about environmental impact and not give away tax abatements at the expense of local infrastructure. The riches of Dayton do not lie in a bank account, but in its people and natural resources. TERESA BIHL, UNION