Dayton Daily News

Court upholds Trump move to drop mine pollution rule

- By Matthew Brown

BILLINGS, MONT. — A U.S. appeals court panel sided with the Trump administra­tion Friday in a mining pollution dispute, ruling that state and federal programs already in place ensure that companies take financial responsibi­lity for future cleanups.

The ruling came after the administra­tion was sued by environmen­tal groups for dropping an Obama-era proposal that would have required the companies to prove they have resources to clean up pollution.

The mining industry has a legacy of companies abandoning polluted sites and leaving taxpayers to cover cleanup costs.

However, the Environmen­tal Protection Agency said in 2017 that stricter regulation­s and modern mining practices have reduced the risks of pollution going unaddresse­d.

Under former President Barack Obama, the agency determined the opposite, saying mining pollution remains an ongoing concern.

The mining industry and members of Congress from Western states had argued the rule was unnecessar­y because of existing cleanup requiremen­ts already enforced at the state and federal level.

The Associated Press has reported that every day, millions of gallons of water loaded with arsenic, lead and other toxic metals flow from some of the most contaminat­ed mining sites in the U.S. and into surroundin­g streams and ponds without being treated.

State and federal laws in recent decades have held companies more accountabl­e than in the past. Environmen­tal groups contend huge loopholes all but ensure that some of today’s mines will foul waterways or require perpetual cleanups.

National Mining Associatio­n President Hal Quinn said the court decision Friday recognizes that companies already provide sufficient bonds and other financial assurances to cover cleanup costs.

An attorney for Earthjusti­ce, which brought the lawsuit on behalf of the Sierra Club, Earthworks and other groups, said the mining industry “shouldn’t be allowed to poison groundwate­r” and cause other environmen­tal problems.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States