Dayton Daily News

China demands U.S. lift tech curbs, will ‘safeguard’ interests

- By Joe McDonald

BEIJING — China demanded Washington lift sanctions on Chinese tech companies and warned Wednesday it will “resolutely safeguard” the country’s interests.

The Ministry of Commerce criticized curbs imposed on sales of U.S. technology to a group of Chinese companies as interferen­ce in the country’s affairs. American officials say those companies provide technology used to repress Muslim minorities in the northweste­rn region of Xinjiang.

“We strongly urge the United States to immediatel­y stop making irresponsi­ble remarks on the issue of Xinjiang, stop interferin­g with China’s internal affairs and remove relevant Chinese entities from the Entity List as soon as possible,” said a ministry statement.

The ministry gave no details of possible retaliatio­n.

Despite the spike in tension, the ministry said Tuesday a trade delegation was going ahead with a trip to Washington this week for talks aimed at ending a tariff war.

“We hope the United States can work together with China to meet each other halfway and promote progress in consultati­ons,” said foreign ministry spokesman, Geng Shuang, at a regular briefing.

The sanctions announced Monday restrict sales of U.S. technology to a group of Chinese companies working on facial recognitio­n, artificial intelligen­ce and other advanced products. Those technologi­es are part of the ruling Communist Party’s industry developmen­t plans.

The U.S. government and independen­t researcher­s say as many as 1 million Muslims in Xinjiang have been sent to detention camps. The government says those facilities are job training centers and its activities are aimed at thwarting terrorism and radicalism.

Beijing has tried for decades to suppress sentiment in Xinjiang in favor of independen­ce or more autonomy for the territory. Chinese authoritie­s say scattered incidents of violence blamed on radicals are part of an internatio­nal Islamic terrorist movement, but independen­t researcher­s say they see no evidence to support that.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States