Dayton Daily News

Democrats’ impeachmen­t of Trump is way too thin

- John Kass John Kass writes for the Chicago Tribune. George Will’s column will return.

Where did the Trump impeachmen­t go?

When House Democrats began selling tickets to their President Donald Trump Impeachmen­t Theater — shouting outrage, preening on those latenight talk shows — it was much meatier business.

At least that’s what Democrats promised. But that’s not what they delivered for considerat­ion for a vote by the full House, was it?

What they offered weren’t High Crimes and Misdemeano­rs. Instead, they offered only attitude and rhetoric, without meat and bone.

They promised everything and yet ended up providing nothing, like air sandwiches offered to feed that angry mob they’ve stoked since the day Trump infuriated them by not losing the election to Hillary Clinton.

So, where has the impeachmen­t gone?

Democrats ended up offering two thin counts: abuse of power and obstructio­n of Congress.

But where were the serious crimes upon which to build a legitimate impeachmen­t and convince Republican­s to join them?

There are no crimes in this, only political arguments predicated on Trump’s great sin:

He defeated Hillary with his 62 million deplorable­s, and Democratic elites have hated him and them since.

The House Democratic impeachmen­t of Trump does accomplish two things.

It drives independen­ts to his side, even those who loathe his manner, his vulgarity and brutishnes­s, because they see what silkies of the left have done.

And it lowers the bar for impeachmen­t, inviting some future Congress to impeach a president just because he defeated them.

Every president has been accused of abusing power by a Congress led by the other party.

Yet there was real abuse of power in this story, which starts in that debunked Russia-collusion fever dream and weaves into Trump’s call with the Ukrainian president when he asked Ukraine to investigat­e the Bidens.

Abuse of power happened when Democratic presidenti­al candidate and then-Vice President Joe Biden was Obama’s point man in Ukraine.

Biden’s son Hunter is a father’s nightmare, a train wreck of a man. But the Ukrainian gas company Burisma didn’t worry about his character or his complete lack of experience in the gas business.

Hunter was Joe Biden’s son, who received at least $50,000 a month from Burisma.

Per Obama, Joe Biden had $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees for Ukraine. But he demanded that the Ukrainian prosecutor investigat­ing Burisma be fired.

“I said ... I’m leaving in six hours,” Biden bragged on video. “If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a b——. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.”

Quid. Pro. Quo.

So why were bribery and extortion removed from the Democrats’ articles of impeachmen­t? Because Joe Biden is their presidenti­al candidate. And discussing quid pro quo, or extortion or bribery, leads right to Joe and Hunter Biden.

In liberal media accounts, Americans who see Trump Impeachmen­t Theater as partisan hackery and farce are often belittled as morons. They’re described as mindless idiots who’ve been sucked into cult of Trump.

But constant media and political ridicule by the liberal elites can backfire.

As it shrinks in stature, the House Democrat impeachmen­t is beginning to resemble those muchhyped products that you find, forgotten and dusty, in the “As Sold on TV” aisle in dreary discount stores.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States