Dayton Daily News

Moms on the virus front lines need help

- By Hayley Brown and Shawn Fremstad

More than 30 million U.S. workers are employed in industries that put them on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. They include grocery store clerks, nurses, cleaners, warehouse workers and bus drivers, among others. Nearly one-in-four frontline workers — 7.5 million — are also mothers caring for minor children.

Mothers make up a larger share of the frontline workforce (23.8%) than they do of the workforce as a whole (16.9%). Nearly a third (32.8%) of workers in child care and social services industries are mothers, as are more than a quarter (28.8%) of workers in health care industries.

On this Mother’s Day, we should honor and applaud these mothers. But what front-line mothers need most is a commitment to ensuring they all have access to paid sick days, paid family and medical leave, affordable and quality child care, and other important benefits during this crisis and after. These kinds of family policies are commonplac­e in other rich nations, but largely lacking in the United States even during a pandemic.

Federal emergency legislatio­n passed in March includes some of these policies, but typically only on a limited and temporary basis. The Families First and Coronaviru­s Response Act requires employers to provide up to 12 weeks of paid family leave to employees who are unable to work because their child’s school or child care center has been closed. The act also requires employers to provide up to 80 hours of paid sick time for employees who have or are experienci­ng symptoms of coronaviru­s, or have been advised to self-quarantine.

Unfortunat­ely, these provisions don’t apply to employers with 500 or fewer employees, and the Labor Department can exempt businesses with fewer than 50 employees. Moreover, the provisions expire at the end of this end of the year. By contrast, most comparable nations had permanent paid-leave protection­s in place before the pandemic; the United States is the only one of 22 high-income nations to lack a permanent, national guarantee of paid leave.

The United States also falls short when it comes to child benefits. Most rich nations provide a “child allowance” or “child benefits” to most or all families with children. These policies recognize that raising children has social value. In Canada, for example, all children in low- and middle-income families receive a monthly child benefit, known as the Canada Child Benefit.

While the United States has a permanent Child Tax Credit, the maximum benefit is much smaller than the Canadian benefit, the credit is paid only once a year, and families with very low incomes receive no or only a small benefit. The CARES Act does provide a $500-per-child benefit for families with children that is more inclusive. However, this is only a one- time benefit, and has been difficult for many families to access.

In the next round of legislatio­n responding to the pandemic, Congress should address these limitation­s, so that all mothers receive the help and support they deserve as essential workers, both in the paid workforce and as unpaid ones caring for their own children. Congress should also act to preserve, expand and improve the quality of our early education and child care system. In addition to helping parents, jobs in the early education and child care system could be an important source of employment for millions of workers displaced from retail and hospitalit­y sectors that are unlikely to bounce back quickly.

Hayley Brown and Shawn Fremstad are with the Center for Economic and Policy Research. They wrote this for InsideSour­ces.com.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States