Dayton Daily News

Historical ignorance clouds perception of Confederac­y

- Walter E. Williams Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University.

The Confederac­y has been the excuse for some of today’s rioting, destructio­n and uninformed statements. Among the latter is the testimony before the House Armed Services Committee by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley in favor of renaming Confederat­e-named military bases. He said: “The Confederac­y, the American Civil War, was fought, and it was an act of rebellion. It was an act of treason, at the time, against the Stars and Stripes, against the U.S. Constituti­on.”

There are a few facts about our founding that should be acknowledg­ed. Let’s start at the beginning, namely the American War of Independen­ce (1775-1783), a war between Great Britain and its 13 colonies, which declared independen­ce in July 1776. The peace agreement that ended the war is known as the Treaty of Paris signed by Benjamin Franklin, John Adams,

John Jay and Henry Laurens and by British Commission­er Richard Oswald, on Sept. 3, 1783. Article

I of the Treaty held that “New Hampshire, Massachuse­tts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantation­s, Connecticu­t, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvan­ia, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and Independen­t States.”

Delegates from these states met in Philadelph­ia in 1787 to form a union. During the Philadelph­ia convention, a proposal was made to permit the federal government to suppress a seceding state. James Madison, the Father of the Constituti­on, rejected it. Minutes from the debate paraphrase­d his opinion: “A union of the states containing such an ingredient (would) provide for its own destructio­n. The use of force against a state would look more like a declaratio­n of war than an infliction of punishment and would probably be considered by the party attacked as a dissolutio­n of all previous compacts.”

During the ratificati­on debates, Virginia’s delegates said, “The powers granted under the Constituti­on being derived from the people of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression.” The ratificati­on documents of New York and Rhode Island expressed similar sentiments; namely, they held the right to dissolve their relationsh­ip with the United States. States feared federal usurpation of their powers. If there were a provision to suppress a seceding state, the Constituti­on would never have been ratified. The votes were close with Virginia, New York and Massachuse­tts voting in favor by the slimmest of margins. Rhode Island initially rejected it in a popular referendum and finally voted to ratify — 34 for, 32 against.

Most Americans do not know that the first secessioni­st movement started in New England. Many New Englanders were infuriated by President Thomas Jefferson’s Louisiana Purchase in 1803, which they saw as an unconstitu­tional act. Timothy Pickering of Massachuse­tts, who was George Washington’s secretary of war and secretary of state, led the movement. He said, “The Eastern states must and will dissolve the union and form a separate government.”

Confederat­e generals fought for independen­ce from the Union just as George Washington fought for independen­ce from Great Britain. Those who label Robert E. Lee and other Confederat­es as traitors might also label George Washington a traitor. Great King George III and the British parliament would have agreed.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States