Dayton Daily News

Blacks’ distrust of vaccines rooted in medical history

- Charles Blow Charles Blowwrites forThe NewYorkTim­es.

It would appear that the people in American hit hardest by COVID-19 — Black people — are also the group most leery about the prospects of a vaccine.

As a Pew Research report published last week pointed out: “Black Americans are especially likely to say they know someone who has been hospitaliz­ed or died as a result of having the coronaviru­s: 71% say this, compared with smaller shares of Hispanic (61%), White (49%) and Asian-American (48 %) adults.”

But that same report contained the following: “Black Americans continue to stand out as less inclined to get vaccinated than other racial and ethnic groups: 42% would do so, compared with 63% of Hispanic and 61% of white adults.”

The unfortunat­e American fact is that Black people in this country have been well-trained, over centuries, to distrust both the government and the medical establishm­ent on the issue of health care.

In the mid-1800s a man in Alabama named James Marion Sims gained national renown as a doctor after performing medical experiment­s on enslaved women, who by definition of their position in society could not provide informed consent.

He performed scores of experiment­al operations on one woman alone, an enslaved woman named Anarcha, before perfecting his technique. Not only that, he operated on these women without anesthesia, in part because he didn’t believe that Black women experience­d pain in the same way that white women did, a dangerous and false sensibilit­y whose remnants linger to this day.

When he finally got his experiment­s to be successful, he began to use them on white women, but he would begin to use anesthesia for those women.

As medical writer Durrenda Ojanuga wrote in the Journal of Medical Ethics in 1993: “Many white women came to Sims for treatment of vesicovagi­nal fistula after the successful operation on Anarcha. However, none of them, due to the pain, were able to endure a single operation.”

Sims would go on to become known as the Father of Gynecology, even though, as one researcher put it:

“Sims failed utterly to recognize his patients as autonomous persons and his own personal drive for success cannot be minimized, especially as a balance to the enormous amount of praise accorded Sims for his work and for subsequent applicatio­ns of the technique developed in Montgomery and elsewhere.”

After the CivilWar and the freeing of the enslaved, the limited and fragile infrastruc­ture for Black people in this country collapsed and an epidemic of disease flourished.

For nearly half of the 20th century, women — often Black — were forcibly sterilized, often without their knowledge. As The Intercept reported in September, “Between 1930 to 1970, 65% of the 7,600-plus sterilizat­ions ordered by the state of North Carolina were carried out on Black women.”

As Ms. Magazine pointed out in 2011:

“Some women were sterilized during cesarean sections and never told; others were threatened with terminatio­n of welfare benefits or denial of medical care if they didn’t ‘consent’ to the procedure; others received unnecessar­y hysterecto­mies at teaching hospitals as practice for medical residents. In the South it was such a widespread practice that it had a euphemism: a ‘Mississipp­i appendecto­my.’ ”

I hope that America can overcome Black people’s trepidatio­ns about this vaccine, but it is impossible to say that that trepidatio­n doesn’t have historical merit.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States