Dayton Daily News

Hyping Jan. 6 is Democrats’ best hope of holding power

- Pat Buchanan Patrick J. Buchanan writes for Creators Syndicate.

To understand what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee investigat­ion of the Capitol Hill events of Jan. 6 is all about, a good place to begin is with the sentencing hearing last week of Paul Hodgkins.

A crane operator from Tampa, Florida, Hodgkins, 38, pleaded guilty to a single count of obstructin­g a joint session of Congress called to confirm Joe Biden as the next president.

Hodgkins entered the Senate chamber carrying a Trump 2020 flag. He committed no assault, no act of destructio­n, no act of violence. Yet, he was sentenced to eight months in prison by U.S. Judge Randolph Moss.

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Mona Sedky argued for a sentence of twice that length because, as she told the judge, “Jan. 6 was genuinely an act of terrorism.”

But is that true? Was

Jan. 6 “an act of terrorism” — of the character if not the magnitude, say, of the Oklahoma City bombing? Hodgkins’ attorney vigorously rejected that depiction. To call Jan. 6 “domestic terrorism,” said Patrick Leduc, is “offensive and gaslightin­g the country ... It was a protest that became a riot, period, full stop.”

Leduc is correct: Jan.

6th was a riot. Had it truly been “domestic terrorism,” as the U.S. attorney claimed, why would she have accepted a guilty plea for a single nonviolent offense?

Why did she not throw the book at the terrorist?

Looking back, what was Jan. 6 in reality?

A huge pro-Trump demonstrat­ion of tens of thousands, out of which a mob of hundreds moved on the Capitol, broke police lines, assaulted cops, rampaged and disrupted an official proceeding. All in all, a shameful disgrace. But 1/6 was not 9/11 or Oklahoma City or Pearl Harbor or the Pulse nightclub or the Las Vegas massacre.

Why is it being hyped like this? Why will the establishm­ent not let go of Jan. 6? Why, half a year on, does it remain an obsession of regime media? The hype never ends. Daily, we hear establishm­ent politician­s and press paint it up as the most awful day in America’s history.

It was, we are told, an “armed insurrecti­on,” “domestic terrorism,” an attempted “coup,”

“an act of treason,” “the worst attack on American democracy since the British burned the Capitol in 1814.”

Pelosi rejected two of House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy’s picks for her select committee — Reps. Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio — because the deck is stacked. Issues Banks and Jordan would have raised would have interrupte­d the agreed-upon narrative.

Every Democrat of the committee has voted to impeach Trump for Jan. 6. Both of the Republican­s Pelosi put on the committee to provide bipartisan balance — Wyoming’s Liz Cheney and Illinois’ Adam Kinzinger — voted to impeach Trump and are the ranking anti-Trump Republican­s on Capitol Hill.

Why are Pelosi and the regime media doing everything to keep Jan. 6 alive? What are the stakes involved? As of today, Jan. 6 is the biggest and last best stick the Democrats have for retaining control of Congress in 2022.

For if that election is not about the worst day for the GOP of the Trump years, it is going to be about the successes and failures of the first two Biden years.

So the Democratic establishm­ent and its media arm have a vital interest in hyping Jan. 6 and not letting go. For Jan. 6, 2021, is their last best hope for holding power after Nov. 8, 2022.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States