Dayton Daily News

U.S. intel faces questions over Afghanista­n, Ukraine misses

- By Nomaan Merchant

Top U.S. intelligen­ce officials were questioned Tuesday about why they misjudged the durability of government­s in both Afghanista­n and Ukraine, and whether they need to reform how intelligen­ce agencies assess a foreign military’s will to fight.

U.S. intelligen­ce believed the U.S.-backed Kabul government would hold out for months against the Taliban and thought Russian forces would overrun Ukraine in a few weeks. Both assessment­s were wrong. The U.S. and Western allies are now rushing to aid Ukraine’s resistance against Russia in what has turned into a grinding, violent stalemate.

“What we missed was the will to fight of the Ukrainians ... and we also missed that in Afghanista­n,” said Sen. Angus King, an independen­t from Maine, at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. He added, “I realize will to fight is a lot harder to assess than number of tanks or volume of ammunition or something. But I hope the intelligen­ce community is doing some soul-searching about how to better get a handle on that question.”

President Joe Biden’s administra­tion disclosed in advance Russian President Vladimir Putin’s intentions to invade Ukraine, a public campaign that it says built support for crushing sanctions on the Russian economy and military support from NATO members. Top U.S. officials have gone to Kyiv to meet with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and pledged more military and intelligen­ce support.

Avril Haines, the U.S. director of national intelligen­ce, said that “will to fight” and “capacity to fight” in tandem were difficult to predict. The National Intelligen­ce Council, a group of advisers that reviews the agencies as a whole, is studying the issue, she said.

“The two of them are issues that are, as you indicated, quite challengin­g to provide effective analysis on,” Haines told King. “And we’re looking at different methodolog­ies for doing so.”

King raised his voice to cut off Lt. Gen. Scott Berrier, head of the Defense Intelligen­ce Agency, after Berrier said he believed the intelligen­ce agencies had done “a great job.”

“General, how can you possibly say that when we were told explicitly, Kyiv would fall in three days and Ukraine would fall in two weeks?” he said. “You’re telling me that was accurate intelligen­ce?”

 ?? AP ?? Defense Intelligen­ce Agency Director Lt. General Scott Berrier testifies before a Senate Armed Services hearing on Tuesday.
AP Defense Intelligen­ce Agency Director Lt. General Scott Berrier testifies before a Senate Armed Services hearing on Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States