Dayton Daily News

Why ‘gentle parenting’ is a cult mentality

- John Rosemond Parenting Visit family psychologi­st John Rosemond’s website at johnrosemo­nd.com; readers may send him email at questions@rosemond.com; due to the volume of mail, not every question will be answered.

This is the Age of the Parenting Cult, the latest iteration of which is so-called “gentle parenting.” GP is the latest attempt by America’s mental health industry to persuade moms (today’s all-too-typical dad is a mere “parenting aide”) to approach discipline such that both child behavior and child mental health problems increase, which they have, and dramatical­ly so, since the early 1970s, when parents began taking their marching orders from psychologi­sts and the like. (Full disclosure: Yours truly is a psychologi­st.)

Lots of moms responded to my recent column on gentle parenting. Comments ranged from “You obviously don’t understand” to testimonie­s of being excluded from the Good Mommy Club for the offenses of scolding and even (gasp!) punishing children for misbehavio­r.

One not-so-gentle mom wrote: “A mother who doesn’t toe the gentle parenting line is going to find herself socially isolated, which means her child is effectivel­y isolated as well.”

That describes a cult mentality. Cults demand conformity and want members to believe those outside the cult represent some sort of threat. A cult’s defining doctrine is either patently false, unprovable or both. Consider the claim recently advanced by a child psychologi­st to cnbc.com that GP, when applied properly, promotes “confidence, independen­ce, self-esteem, and strong emotion regulation skills” (“4 questions about gentle parenting, answered by a child psychologi­st”).

No legitimate research would support that rather hyperbolic claim. However, the gold standard of research into childreari­ng outcomes found that children raised by parents who set and enforce firm limits and punish premeditat­ed misbehavio­r score highest on scales of well-being. Unfortunat­ely, facts mean nothing to a cult’s true believers.

The psychologi­st cited above claims that children are “inherently ‘good’ and that most misbehavio­r is a consequenc­e of ‘emotional dysregulat­ion.’” In other words, misbehavio­r is not intentiona­l; therefore, punishment is inappropri­ate.

The unpleasant truth: Children are sociopaths in the making. Both the toddler and the adult sociopath believe they are entitled to what they want, and that ends justify means. To claim that a toddler who is shrieking like a banshee and trying to gouge his mother’s eyeballs from their sockets because she will not yield to his unreasonab­le demands is fundamenta­lly moral is absurd. He requires calmly resolute discipline, lest he be sociopathi­c when he is a teen.

Unfortunat­ely, largely because of profession­al parenting propaganda of the GP sort, calm, resolute discipline has become an endangered species. In its place we now have “yada-yada discipline,” which does nothing but increase carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

In closing, I will simply point out that mental health profession­als created America’s ubiquitous child discipline problem — and mental health profession­als are the only people benefiting from it.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States