Dayton Daily News

‘It is inexplicab­le that disparitie­s exist between prosecutio­n of sex crimes’

- Guest Columnist Emily Gemar is the Director of Public Policy for the Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence.

A marriage license shouldn’t be a defense to rape in Ohio. But in some circumstan­ces, it is. Although the U.S. made strides to criminaliz­e spousal rape in the late 20th century, loopholes still exist that help perpetrato­rs escape accountabi­lity. Ohio is in the minority of states with such a loophole still on its books. Fortunatel­y, efforts to close this loophole are gaining momentum.

On Nov. 29, the Ohio House of Representa­tives passed House Bill 161 (“Eliminate spousal exceptions for certain sex offenses”), sponsored by Rep. Jessica Miranda, D-Forest Park, and Rep. Brett Hillyer, R-Uhrichsvil­le. This significan­t vote follows decades of advocacy to pass this initiative in Ohio. In fact, lawmakers and advocates in Ohio have tried and failed to close the harmful spousal rape loophole since 1985.

Under current Ohio law, certain sex crimes are exempt from prosecutio­n if the perpetrato­r is married to the victim. So, if a married person drugs their spouse and sexually assaults them, this would not be a crime. However, the same actions committed outside of a marriage, say, between dating partners, would be considered a crime and subject to prosecutio­n. It is inexplicab­le that disparitie­s exist between prosecutio­n of sex crimes and other forms of domestic violence. What has someone’s marital status got to do with the criminal nature of their spouse’s behavior? Assault, stalking, homicide and other crimes against a person may be prosecuted without regard to the marital status of the parties. Singling out sexual violence as a type of crime that married people should have less protection from is egregious.

In my time advocating for an end to this loophole, I’ve encountere­d countless Ohioans who express shock and disgust when they learn that this loophole still exists in our state. Its continued existence reinforces a false narrative that spousal sexual violence is somehow less serious than other forms of sexual violence — it is not.

The reality is married persons do not forfeit their rights to bodily autonomy and safety once they get married. The impacts of spousal rape are also severe and long-lasting. Sexual violence in a relationsh­ip is rarely an isolated incident; it often occurs alongside other forms of abusive behavior, including physical and emotional abuse.

We know that more than half of female survivors of rape report being raped by an intimate partner and that victims report repeat victimizat­ion in that relationsh­ip, higher levels of physical injury, longer lasting trauma and psychologi­cal distress.

A person’s legal relationsh­ip to the person who harms them should never limit their options for safety, accountabi­lity, or healing in the aftermath of sexual assault. No person is the physical property of their spouse, and married people need the same options following a sexual assault as everybody else. Current Ohio law takes away a spouse’s right to consent, regardless of whether they are willing or not. It’s time to finally change that — because a marriage license is not a license to abuse.

House Bill 161 has now moved to the Ohio Senate, where it is assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee for further considerat­ion. We are now advocating for state Senators to begin hearings and pass the legislatio­n expeditiou­sly.

If interested in supporting the bill, you can contact members of the Senate Judiciary Committee here: ohiosenate. gov/committees/judiciary

You can also find your Senator here: ohiosenate.gov/members/district-map.

 ?? ?? House Bill 161 has now moved to the Ohio Senate, where it is assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
House Bill 161 has now moved to the Ohio Senate, where it is assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
 ?? Emily Gemar ??
Emily Gemar

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States