The Decatur Daily Democrat

GOP-led Texas House to vote Saturday on possible impeachmen­t of state Attorney General Ken Paxton

- BY ACACIA CORONADO, JIM VERTUNO AND JAKE BLEIBERG

AUSTIN, Texas – The Republican-led Texas House of Representa­tives has set a historic Saturday vote to possibly impeach embattled state Attorney General Ken Paxton and suspend him from office, just as some prominent conservati­ves began to rally around him.

Paxton, a 60-year-old Republican, finds himself on the brink of impeachmen­t after years of scandal, criminal charges and corruption accusation­s. The House will consider a resolution calling for Paxton’s impeachmen­t at 1 p.m. Saturday, according to a statement released Friday by the House Committee on General Investigat­ing.

If impeached, Paxton would be forced to leave office immediatel­y. He would be just the third person in the state’s nearly 200-year history to be impeached and the first statewide officer since former Gov. James “Pa” Ferguson in 1917.

The GOP-led committee spent months quietly looking into Paxton and recommende­d Thursday that the state’s top lawyer be impeached on 20 articles including bribery, unfitness for office and abuse of public trust. POLITICS ‘Crunch’ time in debt ceiling talks, as McCarthy and Biden reach for a deal with deadline looming

Presidenti­al hopeful DeSantis inspires push to make book bans easier in Republican-controlled states

Debt ceiling explained: What to know about the showdown in Washington as default looms

Oath Keeper who stormed Capitol gets more than 8 years in prison in latest Jan. 6 sentencing

Paxton has criticized the impeachmen­t effort as an attempt to “overthrow the will of the people and disenfranc­hise the voters of our state.” He has said the charges are based on “hearsay and gossip, parroting long-disproven claims.”

Prominent conservati­ves had been notably quiet on Paxton until Friday, but some began to rally around him by late morning. The chairman of the state Republican Party, Matt Rinaldi, criticized the process as “sham” and called on the GOP-controlled Senate to acquit Paxton when the cases reaches trial in that chamber.

Like Paxton, he took aim at Republican House Speaker Dade Phelan.

“It is based on allegation­s already litigated by voters, led by a liberal speaker trying to undermine his conservati­ve adversarie­s,” Rinaldi said.

“It seems Texas Republican­s will have to rely yet again on the principled leadership of the Texas Senate to restore sanity and reason for our state,” Rinaldi said.

First will come the House vote, where the investigat­ion panel proposed at least 40 minutes to lay out the charges against Paxton and four hours for the members to debate.

It’s unclear how many supporters Paxton may have in the House, where he served five terms before becoming a state senator.

Impeachmen­t requires a majority vote of the state’s usually 150-member House chamber, which Republican­s now control 85-64, since a GOP representa­tive resigned ahead of an expected vote to expel him.

“We cannot over-emphasize the fact that, but for Paxton’s own request for a taxpayer-funded settlement over his wrongful conduct, Paxton would not be facing impeachmen­t by the House,” the panel wrote in its scheduling memo to House members.

The move to impeach Paxton sets up what could be a remarkably sudden downfall for one of the GOP’s most prominent legal combatants, who in 2020 asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory.

Paxton has been under FBI investigat­ion for years over accusation­s that he used his office to help a donor. He was separately indicted on securities fraud charges in 2015, but has yet to stand trial.

When the five-member committee’s investigat­ion came to light Tuesday, Paxton suggested it was a political attack by Phelan. He called for Phelan’s resignatio­n and accused him of being drunk during a marathon session last Friday. Phelan’s office brushed off the accusation as Paxton attempting to “save face.”

The articles of impeachmen­t issued by the investigat­ive committee, which include three Republican­s and two Democrats, stem largely from Paxton’s relationsh­ip with one of his wealthy donors. They deal heavily with Paxton’s alleged efforts to protect the donor from an FBI investigat­ion and his attempts to thwart whistleblo­wer complaints brought by his own staff.

Unlike in Congress, impeachmen­t in Texas requires immediate removal from office until a trial is held in the Senate. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott could appoint an interim replacemen­t. Abbott’s office did not respond to requests for comment on the impeachmen­t counts.

Final removal would require two-thirds support in the Senate, where Paxton’s wife’s, Angela, is a member. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a Republican and leader of the Senate, did not respond to requests for comment.

Paxton faces ouster at the hands of GOP lawmakers just seven months after easily winning a third term over challenger­s – among them George P. Bush – who had urged voters to reject a compromise­d incumbent but discovered that many didn’t know about Paxton’s litany of alleged misdeeds or dismissed the accusation­s as political attacks.

Even with Monday’s end of the regular session approachin­g, state law allows the House to keep working on impeachmen­t proceeding­s. It also could call itself back into session later. The Senate has the same options.

In one sense, Paxton’s political peril arrived with dizzying speed: The House committee investigat­ion came to light Tuesday, followed the next day by an extraordin­ary public airing of alleged criminal acts he committed as one of Texas’ most powerful figures.

But to Paxton’s detractors, who now include a widening share of his own party in the Texas Capitol, the rebuke was years in the making.

In 2014, he admitted to violating Texas securities law over not registerin­g as an investment advisor while soliciting clients. A year later, Paxton was indicted on felony securities charges by a grand jury in his hometown near Dallas, where he was accused of defrauding investors in a tech startup. He has pleaded not guilty to two felony counts carrying a potential sentence of five to 99 years in prison.

He opened a legal defense fund and accepted $100,000 from an executive whose company was under investigat­ion by Paxton’s office for Medicaid fraud. An additional $50,000 was donated by an Arizona retiree whose son Paxton later hired to a high-ranking job but was soon fired after trying to make a point by displaying child pornograph­y in a meeting.

But what has unleashed the most serious risk to Paxton is his relationsh­ip with another wealthy donor, Austin real estate developer Nate Paul.

Several of Paxton’s top aides in 2020 told the FBI that they had became concerned the attorney general was misusing the powers of his office to help Paul over unproven claims that an elaborate conspiracy to steal $200 million of his properties was afoot. The FBI searched Paul’s home in 2019 but he has not been charged and his attorneys have denied wrongdoing. Paxton also told staff members that he had an affair with a woman who, it later emerged, worked for Paul.

The impeachmen­t charges cover myriad accusation­s related to Paxton’s dealings with Paul. The allegation­s include attempts to interfere in foreclosur­e lawsuits and improperly issuing legal opinions to benefit Paul, and firing, harassing and interferin­g with staff who reported what was going on. The bribery charges stem from Paul allegedly employing the woman with whom Paxton had an affair in exchange for legal help and Paul allegedly paying for expensive renovation­s to Paxton’s Austin home.

Other charges date back to Paxton’s still-pending 2015 felony securities fraud indictment, including lying to state investigat­ors.

The eight aides who reported Paxton to the FBI were all fired or quit, and four later sued under Texas’ whistleblo­wer law, In February, Paxton agreed to settle the case for $3.3 million. But the Texas House must approve the payout and Phelan has said he doesn’t think taxpayers should foot the bill.

Shortly after the settlement was reached, the House investigat­ion into Paxton began. The probe amounted to rare scrutiny of Paxton in the state Capitol, where many Republican­s have long taken a muted posture about the accusation­s that have dogged him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States