East Bay Times

DA charges 9 with May looting in Walnut Creek

- By Nate Gartrell ngartrell@bayareanew­sgroup.com

WALNUT CREEK >> Prosecutor­s in Contra Costa County have filed looting charges against nine people, accusing them of stealing from stores in downtown Walnut Creek in May.

In one docket, seven people ages 20- 30 were charged with one felony count each of looting the Macy’s department store on Broadway Plaza. In another, a 19-year- old man was charged with looting the nearby Victoria’s Secret, and a 38-year-old woman was charged with a misdemeano­r count of looting the eyeglasses store Site for Sore Eyes.

The alleged offenses all occurred May 31, one of the days that several communitie­s in the Bay Area saw a swath of looting and commercial burglaries in the wake of the May 25 killing of George Floyd in Minneapoli­s. In other parts of the East Bay, some took advantage of law enforcemen­t attention on protests throughout the area, and others were more brazen.

The crime of looting during a state of emergency is known as a “wobbler” offense, meaning it can be charged as either a misdemeano­r or a felony. Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency in early March in response to the coronaviru­s epidemic.

On May 31 in Walnut Creek, dozens of people broke through various storefront­s in broad day

light, running out with whatever merchandis­e they could grab. One person was shot and injured during the pandemoniu­m.

Investigat­ors were aided by the use of surveillan­ce cameras in identifyin­g the suspects, authoritie­s wrote in court records.

Felony looting charges carry a maximum threeyear sentence.

Earlier this year, Contra Costa District Attorney Diana Becton issued an inter

nal memo outlining when prosecutor­s should file charges of looting during a state of emergency. That memo — obtained by this news organizati­on and several others — instructed filing attorneys to question if there was an “articulabl­e reason why another statute wouldn’t adequately address the particular incident” and whether the theft was motivated by financial gain or “personal need,” such as stealing food in the wake of a natural disaster.

Before sending out the memo, Becton refiled several cases as commer

cial burglaries, when they originally had been filed as looting counts.

“I think that the job of a prosecutor is to make sure the charges accurately reflect the conduct,” Becton’s second in command, Venus Johnson, said in a September interview about the memo. “The facts are the facts, and if the facts lead to a looting charge, then a looting charge should be added. If the facts lead to another charge, then those charges should be brought.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States