East Bay Times

Marriage is ever-changing

- Miss Manners Judith Martin www.missmanner­s.com;

DEAR MISS MANNERS >> A young lady I know happily posted the news that she and a young man have ordered custom-designed wedding rings, and that she is making a wed- ding guest list and discussing venues with her mother.

Concurrent with all of this, she insists that she is not officially engaged because he “hasn’t asked her yet.”

I am baffled. When and why did a ritual of proposal, always defined as “him asking her,” become the final determinan­t of an engagement, if planning a wedding does not qualify? And why is it always him asking her, never her asking him?

Another young woman of my acquaintan­ce recently giddily announced “He proposed!” — a year or so after the birth of their child. Aside from the chronologi­cal illogic of this (from my perspectiv­e), I am bothered by the social implicatio­ns for the status of women.

Are they really ceding the final decision-making power in their relationsh­ip to men? Will they soon put the word “obey” back into the marriage vows? It seems that the vital importance placed on the ritual of a proposal has grown in inverse proportion to women’s status as equals in a partnershi­p. I cannot understand why this has happened.

When my parents got married, it was a mutual decision, but married women were always called Mrs. Husband’s Name (first and last). And if she had a baby, the newspapers would report, “The wife of John Smith was delivered of a baby boy.” Women disappeare­d into marriage at the same time that we didn’t make a fetish of “his asking.”

Maybe I just answered my own question. Perhaps women are hanging onto a vestige of what they imagine to be a “man’s place” — some sort of quaint custom, similar to the middle-aged bride being “given away.”

If so, they are being awfully silly and inconsiste­nt. Some of these young women may be heads of corporatio­ns, but they are still waiting for “him” to propose.

Why can’t they see the nonsense in this?

GENTLE READER >> Yes, you answered the question. The lady is not waiting anxiously to see if he will have her. Rather, he is the anxious one, knowing that he must stage a performanc­e for an audience of more than one.

Fond as Miss Manners is of tradition, even anachronis­tic tradition, she wishes people would follow the spirit of the gestures they copy — or parody, as with those hokey proposals. As you point out, those forms were designed for a frank patriarchy. (The bended knee was a theatrical cliche, not a cultural practice.)

If the bride is to be given away, it should be by one parent, or both. Yet many Gentle Readers objected when Miss Manners solved an “absent biological father vs. attentive stepfather” dispute by saying both should step aside in favor of the mother. Her reply to those who said that would insult the stepfather, who had been with the bride since childhood, is that the mother was with her even longer.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States