East Bay Times

No, we're still not back to `normal' yet

- By Abraar Karan, Devabhaktu­ni Srikrishna and Ranu Dhillon Abraar Karan is an infectious disease doctor and researcher at Stanford University. Devabhaktu­ni Srikrishna is an electrical engineer and the founder of www. patientkno­whow.com. Ranu Dhillon is an

Right now, we are at a manageable point in the COVID-19 pandemic. The rate of new U.S. cases has significan­tly slowed since the first omicron surge. Although omicron's BA.2 variants have increased cases, particular­ly in the Northeast, hospitaliz­ations and deaths have declined or leveled off. Vaccinatio­n and prior infection by the earlier omicron surge seem to be protecting most Americans against severe illness.

As a result, some public health pundits are urging Americans to go back to “normal.” But in fact, we should focus broadly on prevention against future variants and airborne illness. Not battling hospital surges right now gives us space to think long term. This approach is all the more urgent because we cannot rely on individual­s to test or isolate constantly and masking is decreasing­ly enforced, especially since federal officials are battling over the travel mask mandate.

We know future waves will threaten us all again. To prepare, we need to improve ventilatio­n to make environmen­ts lower risk for COVID-19 and improve case tracking so we can detect surges early enough to stop them.

Experts have been calling for better ventilatio­n and air filtration standards as far back as early 2020. Supersprea­ding outbreaks — at choirs, weddings, gym classes and restaurant­s — have made clear that transmissi­on can happen at a distance of more than 6 feet, and infectious particles exhaled by a sick person can hang in the air for more than 15 minutes.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organizati­on and other major agencies acknowledg­ed the role of airborne transmissi­on last year. But in the U.S., we're not acting sufficient­ly with that knowledge.

To limit the spread of airborne illness, hospital isolation rooms are required by the CDC to cycle through new air at least 12 times per hour. Given that people are typically most contagious with COVID-19 when still out in the community early during infection, state and federal government should require equally strict filtration standards wherever possible in shared, crowded places.

And the public should be notified of the air quality in buildings and public transit before entering, as well as of its potential health effects such as COVID-19 risk. (Translatin­g air changes per hour and CO2 levels, which reflect crowding and pollutants, into a grading system is one place to start.) Just as restaurant­s have health inspection reports with letter grades in their windows, shared indoor spaces should display their air quality ratings. These ratings can help people adjust their behavior appropriat­ely: For instance, people may choose to wear high-quality masks to attend an event that is important to them but has poor air quality.

In March, the White House released a plan for cleaning air to reduce COVID-19 spread. But this document lacks specifics around ventilatio­n and filtration and is largely a list of suggestion­s. While the White House announceme­nt emphasizes that the American Rescue Plan allocates $122 billion for schools and $350 billion for state, local and tribal government­s to pursue clean indoor air, it is unclear how recipients will distribute this money in the absence of federal standards.

That puts the onus on states and public health department­s to set clear goals and transparen­tly track progress. In California, the public health department recommends four to six air changes per hour of air filtration in indoor public spaces with low ventilatio­n. Yet last year, San Francisco's BART transit system installed virus-trapping filters that replace the air more than 50 times per hour.

The state should eliminate inconsiste­ncies across public spaces and support public health by recommendi­ng a minimum of 12 air changes per hour to match the hospital isolation room standard.

Ventilatio­n measures can help minimize further harm to those who have consistent­ly borne the greatest toll of the pandemic: low-income communitie­s and communitie­s of color. Many such families live in crowded, multigener­ational households, with family members working frontline jobs that increase their exposure to infection and the likelihood they will transmit the virus to older or other high-risk relatives. They may also lack the space to isolate safely in their homes.

In addition to pandemic basics such as protective masks and rapid tests, the government should provide these households with portable home air purifiers to help reduce household spread if one person gets infected.

The other key step for COVID-19 outbreak prevention is earlier and more accurate case detection than we have now. Rapid at-home test kits have made it harder for state health department­s to keep accurate infection counts, since most people aren't sending their results to labs or the government. And many samples are not sent in for analysis, including genomic sequencing that helps detect new variants.

By focusing on ventilatio­n and testing, states can better prepare for an uncertain COVID-19 future. Pretending the pandemic is behind us doesn't mean it is. Let's not become complacent when we need to do the opposite.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States