East Bay Times

Tentative deal struck for nurses on strike

Contract, which still must be ratified, would give them raises totaling over 17% over 3 years

- By Shomik Mukherjee smukherjee@bayareanew­sgroup.com

After striking for a full week, the union representi­ng 5,000 hospital nurses reached a tentative contract agreement with Stanford Health Services late Friday that, if ratified this weekend, could see them return to work Tuesday.

Nurses at Stanford Hospital and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital started picketing Monday in front of the hospitals as they demanded higher wages and additional staffing to help them cope with a coronaviru­s pandemic that has forced many to work long, stressful hours.

After days of negotiatio­ns, the nurses union, Committee for Recognitio­n of Nursing Achievemen­t, announced a deal that would raise nurses' salaries 7% this year, 5% in April 2023 and another 5% in April 2024, and boost their health benefits.

Stanford also guaranteed an additional week of pre-scheduled vacation for all nurses starting in 2024, as well as additional protection­s against workplace violence, including a new response team at the children's hospital.

Workers did not picket at the hospitals Saturday in accordance with a Monday-to-Friday strike schedule.

If the agreement is ratified, nurses will be back to work as early as Tuesday, the union announced. Traveling nurses have been treating patients since the regular nurses went on strike.

“We stood strong behind our demands for fair contracts that give us the resources and support we need to take care of ourselves, our families and our patients,” Colleen Borges, the union president, said in a statement.

“We are proud to provide worldclass patient care — and are glad the hospitals have finally listened to us,” Borges added.

In a statement, Stanford Health Care said it is “extremely pleased” that a three-year contract was reached and “we truly look forward to welcoming our colleagues back on Tuesday.”

Union leaders had cited nurses' fatigue and burnout as among the reasons to strike, and became upset upon discoverin­g that the hospitals would temporaril­y rescind the health benefits of nurses who participat­ed.

“It feels like a slap in the face,” Packard bedside nurse Jessica Butler, who is pregnant and in need of health care, said Friday about losing health benefits. “They say they value us, but this is showing that that's not true.”

In a statement, Stanford Health Care said it was “standard national practice” to provide benefits only to employees who are actively working.

The strike drew the attention of lawmakers and a visit Friday from Sen. Alex Padilla.

To fill in for the striking nurses, Stanford Hospital hired traveling nurses through an employment agency offering $13,000 a week in salary, plus free food, housing and transporta­tion.

The Stanford strike was the latest by Bay Area nurses who say they have worked unreasonab­ly long hours, skipped holidays and dealt with the constant onslaught of death and suffering unleashed by the pandemic.

Many nurses have given up on the field, leaving hospitals short-staffed and struggling to meet legal nurse-topatient ratios.

A couple of week ago, 8,000 nurses across Northern California staged a oneday strike at 18 Sutter Health facilities. Recent health care strikes also took place in Oregon, Massachuse­tts, New York, Montana and Alabama.

And late last year, close to 4,000 Kaiser workers walked out, demanding better compensati­on and higher staffing levels, forcing the health care provider's facilities to temporaril­y stop some services.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States