East Bay Times

Evidence of big military loss deflates Russians

- By Anton Troianovsk­i and Marc Santora

The destructio­n wreaked on a Russian battalion as it tried to cross a river in northeaste­rn Ukraine last week is emerging as among the deadliest engagement­s of the war, with estimates based on publicly available evidence now suggesting that well over 400 Russian soldiers were killed or wounded.

And as the scale of what happened comes into sharper focus, the disaster appears to be breaking through the Kremlin's tightly controlled informatio­n bubble.

Perhaps most striking, the Russian battlefiel­d failure is resonating with a stable of pro-Russian war bloggers — some of whom are embedded with troops on the front line — who have reliably posted to the social network Telegram with claims of Russian success and Ukrainian cowardice.

“The commentary by these widely read milblogger­s may fuel burgeoning doubts in Russia about Russia's prospects in this war and the competence of Russia's military leaders,” the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based research body, wrote this past weekend.

On Wednesday, the Russian command reportedly sent about 550 troops of the 74th Motorized Rifle Brigade of the 41st Combined Arms Army to cross the Donets River at Bilohorivk­a, in the eastern Luhansk region, in a bid to encircle Ukrainian forces near Rubizhne.

Satellite images reveal that Ukrainian artillery destroyed several Russian pontoon bridges and laid waste to a tight concentrat­ion of Russian troops and equipment around the river.

The Institute for the Study of War, citing analyses based on the publicly available imagery, indicated that there could have been as many as 485 Russian soldiers killed or wounded and more than 80 pieces of equipment destroyed.

As the news of the losses at the river crossing in Bilohorivk­a started to spread, some Russian bloggers did not appear to hold back their criticism of what they said was incompeten­t leadership.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States