East Bay Times

Reducing the Cost of Problemati­c EV Charger Installati­ons

- By Peter Douglas

As more and more consumers purchase electric vehicles, many are discoverin­g the significan­t benefits of home charging. Fueling an EV at a public charging station continues to be slower than filling a tank with gasoline, but the convenienc­e and low cost of home charging greatly outweigh this relatively infrequent drawback. These advantages are increasing because state-of-the-art EVs are now traveling much greater distances on a single charge, reducing the frequency of visits to public charging stations during longer excursions. Improving widespread access to home charging is emerging as a key prerequisi­te to fullscale EV adoption, and promising new technologi­es are being developed to overcome barriers.

In most cases, homeowners are able to install rapid Level 2 home chargers that can fully refuel an EV overnight, when electricit­y rates are low. The cost of the installati­on is minor compared to the purchase price of the EV and is rightly seen as an indispensa­ble investment. In some cases, however, a homeowner’s existing electrical panel is already near its full capacity, and upgrading the panel to handle the additional load of an EV charger is prohibitiv­ely expensive. The technical barrier is frustratin­g because an EV charger will only trigger a capacity shortfall when other major appliances are in use, but this is rarely a problem when operating at night. There are also situations where an existing electrical subpanel has additional capacity but doesn’t have any remaining spaces for a circuit breaker dedicated to an EV charger.

Similar technical barriers complicate the installati­on of home chargers in multiunit dwellings where tenants park their vehicles in assigned parking spaces. These closely packed chargers need to deliver the necessary electricit­y and provide a mechanism for billing the appropriat­e tenants. California and Canada have finalized regulation­s that will phase out the sale of internal combustion vehicles by 2035, and providing the convenienc­e of home charging to renters is now recognized as a major environmen­tal justice challenge.

Luckily, solutions are being developed that lower the cost of problemati­c Level 2 home charger installati­ons. An innovative company based in Canada called Recharge Vehicule Electrique (RVE) is determined to transform the electric vehicle charging industry by overcoming barriers to residentia­l charging. Their DCC product line avoids the load limitation­s of existing electrical panels by monitoring the total current in real time and safely deactivati­ng the EV charger whenever it might cause an undesirabl­e overload. Since these overloads are extremely rare, RVE’s load shedding devices provide a safe, practical way to manage the home delivery of electric fuel. They are also extremely useful for reducing the expense of multiunit installati­ons and facilitati­ng the billing of individual tenants.

The proactive innovation­s of progressiv­e companies like RVE stand in stark contrast to the do-nothing attitudes of EV naysayers who insist that we will not be able to generate enough electricit­y to fuel a growing fleet of EVs. The DCC product line demonstrat­es that EVs can be refueled at night without exceeding the load capacity of our existing residentia­l buildings, tapping into the cheap, unused generation capacity of our electricit­y suppliers. When renters enjoy the same inexpensiv­e, convenient benefits of home charging currently available to homeowners, our ongoing transition away from internal combustion vehicles can be accomplish­ed in a more equitable way.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States