East Bay Times

Climate program still harmful to vulnerable communitie­s

- By María Arévalo and Katherine Lee María Arévalo is a member of the Central Valley Defenders for Clean Air and Water. Katherine Lee is the Richmond youth organizer at the Asian Pacific Environmen­tal Network. They wrote this for CalMatters.

Last fall, Gov. Gavin Newsom made some ambitious remarks after signing dozens of climate, energy and environmen­tal policies, saying, “We're cleaning the air we breathe, holding the big polluters accountabl­e, and ushering in a new era for clean energy.”

For so many of us across the state, we need bold action to make our air breathable.

Instead what we've seen is polluted air, state funding for big polluters and incentives for dirty energy supported by taxpayer dollars. Big promises mean nothing when one of the state's major climate policies acts against its own stated goals.

The low carbon fuel standard, or LCFS, undermines the needs of frontline communitie­s and the state's own agenda: air quality improvemen­t, environmen­tal justice and climate solutions. As one of California's biggest climate programs, the LCFS generates thousands of credits that some major polluters have used — and likely will continue to use — to enable continued investment­s in combustion fuels.

The LCFS program incentiviz­es this growth, capturing methane from massive dairies that are heavily polluting the air. Since the program started in 2011, 80% of the billions of dollars in LCFS annual revenues goes to biogas and biofuels that end up being burned in engines — worsening our air quality, extending our reliance on polluting transporta­tion and harming the health and wellbeing of disadvanta­ged communitie­s.

These sources of pollution need to go away. In Richmond, Chevron continues to release emissions into the air while residents suffer from rates of asthma that are twice the state average. The LCFS program incentiviz­es these emissions by subsidizin­g fossil hydrogen, giving them an opportunit­y to expand their operations at a time when we need to be building a future beyond oil.

On top of rising rents and limited access to high-paying jobs, pollution from the refinery is making people sick. Chevron continues to put their profits over people and health through dangerous flaring, oil spills and pollution.

In Pixley, a town in Tulare County, residents have seen firsthand how biogas incentives encourage dairies to grow, further polluting the air and diminishin­g quality of life.

Pixley is surrounded by nearly 30 dairies with about 140,000 cows, outnumberi­ng residents 32 to 1. Under the LCFS program, the dairies are paid to produce “biomethane” — in other words, they receive government funds to capture methane, a combustion fuel that still produces greenhouse gases, while also adding more cows to factory farms that further pollute nearby areas.

Seven dairies in Pixley participat­e in the LCFS program, and the majority of those have expanded significan­tly. Families, friends and neighbors' breathing complicati­ons, nose bleeds, headaches and the smell of manure and swarms of flies have gotten worse and worse.

Technology promoted by corporatio­ns as a “solution” to these problems has only added to our concerns. The state's heralded fuel standards policy may make dollars for big dairies, but it does not make sense for California communitie­s.

The California Air Resources

Board needs to commit to resolving these issues, but so far their actions show no signs of listening to community concerns.

So, disadvanta­ged areas are counting on the governor's leadership to ensure the LCFS meets the needs of all California­ns, to ultimately resolve the glaring discrepanc­ies between political promises and state actions.

The LCFS must prioritize solutions that are pollution-free from end-to-end and leave biogas and biofuels behind. We all deserve clean air and a healthy environmen­t. The future of so many communitie­s depend on it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States