UC again in spotlight regarding limits on free speech
Issues of academic freedom and safety have campuses mulling new proposal
Sixty years after its flagship Berkeley campus became the epicenter of a student free-speech movement, the University of California
is again at the center of debate over freedom of expression amid disputes at colleges over the IsraelHamas war.
On Wednesday, the UC Regents took up a proposed policy that would limit how campus departments could express opinions about contentious or complex issues on their publicly funded university websites. Demonstrators disrupted the meeting shortly after the policy was introduced for discussion. The regents returned to discuss the proposal and voted to consider adoption at their next meeting in May.
“What we are facing today is uncharted territory in many respects,” UC President Dr. Michael V. Drake said Wednesday as the meeting convened in Los Angeles. “We are navigating it actively. We are not always perfect, but we are learning and adjusting as we go.”
Regent Jay Sures, a Los Angeles talent agent leading the discussion on the policy, stressed that “preserving academic freedom and freedom of speech are absolutely imperative as we put a policy in place, if we put a policy in place.”
“In fact,” Sures added, “it is core to the mission of the University of California.”
Though the proposed policy isn't specific to a subject matter, it comes in the wake of the Oct. 7 attack on Israeli civilians by Gaza-based Hamas terrorists in which 1,200 Israelis were killed and 250 taken hostage. The subsequent airstrikes by Israeli forces in Gaza has killed at least 30,000 people and destroyed much of Gaza's buildings and infrastructure, causing a widespread humanitarian crisis.
Following the Oct. 7 attack, the UC Office of the President issued a statement condemning the “sickening and incomprehensible” violence and that “our expressions of grief extend to all innocent people affected by this ongoing conflict.”
But the UC Ethnic Studies Faculty Council responded in a letter that month that such administration statements “distort and misrepresent the unfolding genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and thereby contribute to the racist and dehumanizing erasure of Palestinian daily reality.”
The proposed policy originally
was to be taken up in January, but the Board of Regents put off a vote until March to allow for modifications. The recommended proposal Wednesday would prohibit staff from posting discretionary statements about political or controversial matters on department home pages. But a link to a separate opinion statement could be provided although it must be clear the statement doesn't reflect a position of the university as a whole.
Faculty who are supporting the Palestinian cause and are critical of Israel oppose the policy. UCLA Faculty for Justice in Palestine wrote in a Tuesday article for UCLA's Daily Bruin that it “directly threatens academic freedom and makes
faculty vulnerable to political retaliation at the University of California.”
Several board members voiced concerns.
“When the timing aligns with certain expressions, it makes the underlying policy suspect,” Regent John A. Perez said.
“My concern is around enforcement,” added Regent Keith Ellis. “I'm concerned this could potentially be used as a weapon against faculty in some way. I don't think it's 100% there.”
But the board was mostly supportive.
“I don't see this as a break with free speech,” Regent Joel Raznick said. “I think that it actually embraces free speech.”
Board Chair Rich Leib
said that “we're trying to have a safe community and an open community — if the economics department decides to have a MAGA rally, it shouldn't be on a university website. It's getting to a point where it's important to clarify that.”
It's unclear how much the policy would affect department communications. At least one, UC-Santa Cruz's Critical Race and Ethnic Studies department, advertised a “Faculty for Justice in Palestine” group at the campus on its home page. But it was unclear whether that would run afoul of the policy.
UC is hardly the only college system facing such issues. In November, Barnard College, a private New York City women's liberal arts college, issued a policy that political statements can't be posted on official college websites without administrative approval.
But it's a particularly sensitive topic at the University of California, where students at Berkeley in 1964 led a free-speech movement protesting campus restrictions of on-campus political demonstrations supporting civil rights and opposing the Vietnam War.
Both sides in the policy debate have claimed that the safety of the university's students and faculty have been jeopardized by the dispute over the Israel-Gaza conflict. UCLA Faculty for Justice in Palestine argued in its article that critics of Israel face a “heightened wave of repression” and that the proposed policy “will soon cascade into many other topics and areas, from sexual and reproductive rights to critical race theory.”
But policy supporters point to acts of violence by anti-Israel demonstrators against Jewish students. On Tuesday, the House of Representatives Education Committee formally requested a wide range of documents from UC-Berkeley on Tuesday as part of an investigation of campus antisemitism.
In late February, anti-Israel protesters disrupted a Students Supporting Israel event at UC Berkeley featuring an Israeli speaker, surrounded the venue and broke down its doors, forcing attendees to be escorted to safety.