El Dorado News-Times

False dichotomie­s and what to do about them

- Caleb baumgardne­r Local Columnist Caleb Baumgardne­r is a local attorney. He can be reached at caleb@baumgardne­rlawfirm.com.

The truth is, I really, really, really hate how most political, social and economic issues are framed in our discourse. The frames of reference we use to talk about them are unhelpful at best and dehumanizi­ng at worst. That’s a strong word, but I think it applies here.

Let me tell you why.

Since approximat­ely 1980, our country and much of the world has been dominated by what is called neoliberal economics. The foundation­al thinker of neoliberal economics was an

Austrian gent by the name of Friedrich Hayek, who did most of his writing in the early 20th century. His most famous work is “The

Road to Serfdom,” published in 1944. His intellectu­al archnemesi­s was the British economist John Maynard Keynes, whose ideas formed the bedrock of economic thought and public policy in the West from the late 1940’s to the late 1970’s. Keynes’ ideas were dominant in the United States during what is frequently called “The Golden Age of Capitalism.” The funny thing is that Hayek believed that the Golden Age of Capitalism wasn’t really very capitalist at all.

Hayek’s ideas were popularize­d by the likes of Milton Friedman, a name known at least in passing to many Americans, and his colleagues at the University of Chicago. Their ideas greatly influenced the policies implemente­d by President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Since that time, neoliberal economic policies have been adopted in much of the world. Every American president since Reagan has been a neoliberal to some degree. Anyone who thinks otherwise is not sufficient­ly familiar with neoliberal­ism or its influence on those presidenti­al administra­tions. Or if they are, they’re trying to sell you something or they’re just lying to you. Or both. Whether you’re a conservati­ve or a liberal, you’re probably some kind of neoliberal and you don’t even know it.

According to its own adherents, neoliberal economics strives to be “value neutral,” meaning that it seeks to implement policy solely based on economic science and free of any sort of moral underpinni­ng, since morality is subjective, relative and therefore practicall­y meaningles­s. Mind you, those are the neoliberal­s talking, not me.

Furthermor­e, since economic value is the only meaningful measure of worth in neoliberal­ism, human beings have no inherent, intrinsic value that is not economical­ly quantifiab­le. Your worth as a human being is determined by your market worth.

In the old state socialist systems, human beings were told that they derived their value from the state. A few of them, like China, are still around. In today’s “free economies,” human beings are told, implicitly more than explicitly, that they derive their value from their economic wealth. Since the dominant dichotomy is between the state and the individual, any assertion that human value exists independen­tly of an economic indicator is attacked as tyranny, statism, fascism, socialism, communism, Marxism or any number of other dirty words that have lost virtually all of their meaning in today’s political discourse.

It is considered impossible for human beings to have inherent, inalienabl­e value. That value must come from the state or the market.

This is a false, evil and profoundly stupid dichotomy, but it is the one in which nearly all of our political, social and economic discussion­s are framed. And that is a big part of what has gotten us where we are today.

The value of the human person, however, comes from neither the state nor the market, and both the state and the market must be made to serve the human person and not rule them. The present neoliberal narrative finds this incoherent, and so lashes out at this idea with its standard attacks against the state, socialism or whatever other words it decides to use interchang­eably.

We have created a society that is incapable of seeing itself as human, and any assertion of our humanity is met with ridicule and anger.

We must free ourselves of this concept, and once we do, we must fearlessly and lovingly remind ourselves and others of our humanity, no matter how much society’s dominant values wish us to forget it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States