El Dorado News-Times

Officials make case for renewing FISA surveillan­ce powers Tuesday


WASHINGTON (AP) — Biden administra­tion officials urged Congress on Tuesday to renew a surveillan­ce program the government has long seen as vital in protecting national security but whose future is uncertain because of scrutiny from an unusual alignment of civil liberties advocates and some Republican­s.

The program, which is under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act, or FISA, grants American spy agencies sweeping powers to surveil and examine communicat­ions of foreigners located outside the United States. It’s set to expire at year’s end unless Congress agrees to renew it.

Officials in the Democratic administra­tion, bracing for a contentiou­s debate on Capitol Hill about reauthoriz­ing the program, sought on Tuesday to make a public case about the value of the statutory authoritie­s that are at risk of expiring. They asserted that the program in recent years has yielded valuable insight into ransomware attacks on critical infrastruc­ture, helped disrupt potential acts of terror and efforts to recruit spies, and contribute­d to the killing of al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahri in a drone strike last August.

At issue is a provision of FISA known as Section 702, which allows spy agencies to collect huge swaths of foreign communicat­ions without a warrant. But that tool has drawn scrutiny from civil liberties advocates because it results in the incidental collection from Americans when those Americans are in contact with the foreign surveillan­ce targets.

“As of today, I don’t accept the claim that Americans’ privacy is adequately protected under the current 702 program,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., a longtime Senate Intelligen­ce Committee member who has long pressed U.S. spy agencies on their compliance with civil liberties.

Section 702 was first added to FISA in 2008 and was renewed for six years in 2018, when then-President Donald Trump, who routinely lambasted government intelligen­ce agencies, originally tweeted opposition to the program but then reversed himself.

This year’s fight for renewal is again unfolding in a polarized political climate. Republican­s still angry over FBI errors during the investigat­ion into links between Russia and Trump’s 2016 Republican presidenti­al campaign say they’re skeptical of the government’s need for broad spy powers and maintain the authoritie­s are ripe for abuse and overreach.

But the flaws during the Russia probe, which involved warrants to a secretive surveillan­ce court to monitor the communicat­ion of a former Trump campaign aide, are different from the Section 702 authoritie­s, which allow for communicat­ions to be collected without a warrant.

Even so, the new Republican majority in the U.S. House has already formed a panel on the “weaponizat­ion” of the federal government, aligning with progressiv­e Democrats who have pushed for more curbs on warrantles­s surveillan­ce.

As part of an effort to persuade Congress to renew the program, and to assuage potential privacy concerns, Biden administra­tion officials held a background briefing for reporters and released a statement from national security adviser Jake Sullivan and a letter to lawmakers from Attorney General Merrick Garland and the national intelligen­ce director, Avril Haines.

Separately, Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen, the Justice Department’s top national security official, delivered the same message in a speech at the Brookings Institutio­n think tank.

“The bottom line is that Section 702 gives us the intelligen­ce that’s necessary for us to stay one step ahead of our adversarie­s, and we cannot afford to let it lapse,” Olsen said. “So, it is time to sound the alarm. We must act with urgency, and that is why I am here today.”

National security officials say Section 702 makes possible their most critical work, from collecting intelligen­ce on China to stopping ransomware attacks and other cyber intrusions that have disrupted government agencies and a wide range of industries. But they have declined to publicly give specifics of how they use surveillan­ce programs, saying those are classified.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States