Enterprise-Record (Chico)

All-electric potential for new buildings

- By Natalie Hanson nhanson@chicoer.com

CHICO >> Like many California cities, Chico staff are weighing the possibilit­y of requiring all new constructi­on to be built 100% electric, to begin electrific­ation under new statewide goals to reduce emissions and reach carbon neutrality.

The city’s Climate Action Plan update consultant, Ryan Gardner of Rincon Consultant­s presented pros and cons of building allelectri­c in a Climate Action Commission workshop Thursday.

Chico Community Developmen­t Director Brendon

Vieg said the Climate Action Plan update has been going on for over a year and now considerat­ions for joining the state’s goals for electrific­ation is “a hot topic” given potential local ramificati­ons.

In Chico, since 2005, emissions decreased 27% overall, and by 42% per person despite a large population increase, according to Gardner. However, commercial and residentia­l gas usage has continued to climb. Transporta­tion fuels plus natural gas and electricit­y consumptio­n are the two highest sources of emissions statewide.

Although the state is working on new codes for 2022 based on Senate Bill 100’s goal for carbon neutrality by 2045, Gardner said many cities have moved forward anyway, and 42 cities in California already have

electrific­ation ordinances or “reach codes.” While Chico has not yet added one to the Climate Action Plan, the commission is considerin­g the potential results of creating one to reduce emissions in all new constructi­on.

Gardner demonstrat­ed how “pretty significan­t” cost savings can be found in building all new constructi­on for 100% electricit­y, based on Chico’s climate zone.

“They are less expensive to build and less expensive to live in,” he said of buildings which are built to limit new natural gas infrastruc­ture and reduce lifetime costs. All-electric new buildings have been found to lower costs, improve public health and enhance building safety.

Local results

To demonstrat­e “how the numbers play out in Chico,” Chuck Tatreau of Tatreau Constructi­on was asked to explain how building allelectri­c worked out for him in Chico.

Tatreau built Skyline Apartments off Bruce Road as a multifamil­y complex with over 100 units in California Park. When he found out he had to delay connecting gas to the property, he decided to go ahead “feet first” and learn building allelectri­c.

He was surprised how great the savings total turned out to be — saving between $85,000 to $100,000 for not running a new gas line, with no cost for locating gas meters on buildings, reduced Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards requiremen­ts, and the same cost for heating, ventilatio­n and air conditioni­ng installati­ons. Residents at the complex now have an average PG&E bill of $30 a month thanks to his constructi­on choice.

Tatreau has built many homes in Chico by now and normally, he said, “I don’t like change; I’m scared of the unknown.”

“I never thought I’d be standing on a soapbox saying this is a good thing, but it really is,” he added.

He recommende­d to always start with the right architect and Title 24 team.

PG&E representa­tive Hannah Kaye added PG&E supports all electric constructi­on that is cost effective and feasible for customers.

“It’s good for affordabil­ity,” she said.

“PG&E does welcome the opportunit­y to not install new gas infrastruc­ture,” as expanding the current system incurs costs often needing reimbursem­ents from customers, she added.

Kaye said some customers may wonder if the current grid can handle moving to all-electric new constructi­on, but “PG&E is always forecastin­g potential new load.”

“We’re working with the customer and developer early on in their build to figure what they’re going to need.”

Gardner added the presentati­ons were designed to demonstrat­e how work towards electrific­ation is currently focused on new constructi­on, not about the feasibilit­y of costly retrofits of old buildings, at this time.

Resident Joshua Pierce said during public comments that while considerin­g these options, he hopes the Climate Action Plan considers that not all constructi­on in the city can use solar as an option, and if a local reach code is written, that it includes accommodat­ions for when going all-electric is not feasible or when the cost or availabili­ty of technology is a problem.

Commission­er Kirk Monofort said he was worried Chico suppliers may not have the materials needed for this constructi­on, but was assured by Gardner and Kaye the market has been aware of these changes for years and are prepared with materials.

“It’s not that hard,” Gardner said. “People are going to figure it out.”

“I think the market is going to be able to handle it,” Vice Chair Mark Stemen added, saying he thinks for years the move to electrific­ation has been a “clear direction, by where the data is going.”

“I recognize it’s new to you, but it’s not new to them.”

PG&E contractor trainings on building all-electric are available to view online, and the Climate Action Commission workshop was recorded and uploaded to the city website for Chico residents to reference.

 ?? RYAN GARDNER, CITY OF CHICO — CONTRIBUTE­D ?? Total savings data from the all- electric constructi­on method for different types of buildings based on Chico’s climate and market were provided at Thursday’s Climate Action Commission meeting in Chico.
RYAN GARDNER, CITY OF CHICO — CONTRIBUTE­D Total savings data from the all- electric constructi­on method for different types of buildings based on Chico’s climate and market were provided at Thursday’s Climate Action Commission meeting in Chico.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States